It's not really so much about performance gains as it is being able to
take advantage of larger datasets and more memory than you can with 32
bit.


>>> David Henry <[email protected]> 4/27/2009 1:54 PM
>>>

How much actual performance gain do you get from 64bit CF?



Dave wrote:
> I'm checking our Railo right now and it runs fine on Ubuntu x64.  Not
sure
> what limitations it might have compared to an actual CF server
though.Dave
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Jeff Schoby <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
>   
>> Only point I could see is if you didn't have the big enterprise
version
>> of CF, standard doesn't come in 64 bit, only 32 - which I think is
>> stupid, but whatever.
>>
>> Aside from that, every distro has 64 bit versions of apache, mysql,
and
>> java - so it's not really such a big deal anymore.
>>
>> Where it gets tricky is when you try to compile your own stuff,
even
>> then it's not that big of a deal.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Schoby
>> Unix/Network Admin
>> City of Columbia, Missouri
>> 573.874.6320
>>
>>
>>     
>>>>> David Henry <[email protected]> 4/27/2009 11:05
AM
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>> Adrian,
>>
>> I discourage /inexperienced /users from jumping on 64 bit because
the
>> directions for CF, Java, Apache, MySQL, and most others are written
>> 32-bit first and 64-bit as an afterthought.  The smallest difference
in
>>
>> path, url, version, or command arguments can leave the new user
>> completely derailed from their tutorial in unfamiliar waters.  With
a
>> CLI and an error message the user will either become a Linux guru
very
>>
>> quickly or will declare that all Linux sucks and give up.
>>
>> If you need 4GB+ memory, go for 64bit.  If you need 100% accurate
>> directions without extra steps because you've never done this Linux
>> thing before, use 32bit.
>>
>> ...then again, perhaps the day has finally come to leave 32bit
behind.
>> David
>> Adrian Moreno wrote:
>>     
>>> In order to not clutter the other thread, my question to David
Henry
>>>       
>> and
>>     
>>> everyone else, is why not try a 64-bit distro as your first Linux
>>> experience?
>>>
>>> I used 64-bit RedHat ES3 on an Intel Itanium a few years ago where
>>>       
>> there
>>     
>>> was no 32-bit backward compatibility. Other than compiling a few
>>>       
>> programs
>>     
>>> on a 64-bit compiler, I saw no differences between the 64-bit and
any
>>>       
>>> 32-bit distro I'd used to date.
>>>
>>> I use 64-bit Ubuntu at home and had no problems installing CF, et.
>>>       
>> al. on
>>     
>>> it either.
>>>
>>> What problems would you expect a new linux user to run into
dealing
>>>       
>> with
>>     
>>> 64-bit vs. 32-bit?
>>>
>>> Curious,
>>>
>>> Adrian
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>
>>
>>     
>
> 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-linux/message.cfm/messageid:4498
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-linux/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.14

Reply via email to