On Mar 12, 2009, at 4:07 AM, Heinke Hoeck wrote:

I would propose a short suffix like '_raw'.
Are the units free selectable for the '_raw' data? Should we add 'raw_unit'? I think the raw data are a proxy. This should be commented in the header.

What does "the raw data are a proxy" mean, please?  (Proxy for what?)

Short suffix '_raw' works for me.

If you are suggesting adding 'raw_unit' as an attribute, I think this will be necessary. The existing attribute 'unit' is not sufficient because of the restriction that it be something from UD_Units. I propose freely selectable units, with a strongly recommended practice of using a URI.

This makes me realize that the most abstract version of this use case is data in any units that can not be transformed to the canonical units, for example: - partially transformed units that aren't raw but aren't in science form - data not in UD_Units -- alternate formats for certain complex data values - data not in UD_Units -- new or atypical measurements not in UD_Units, like 'counts' The latter conditions are somewhat common observationally, in my experience. The middle one can be avoided by transformation, but not necessarily the first or last.

So if we wanted to generalize our semantics, we could make the suffix '_alternate_unit' (or a shorter variant?) and the attribute 'alternate_unit'. On the other hand, it's probably acceptable just to use '_raw' for the more general situations described above.

John


On Mar 12, 2009, at 4:07 AM, Heinke Hoeck wrote:

Dear all,
I agree with Jonathan,
I would propose a short suffix like '_raw'.
Are the units free selectable for the '_raw' data? Should we add 'raw_unit'? I think the raw data are a proxy. This should be commented in the header.

Best wishes
Heinke


Jonathan Gregory wrote:
Dear all

I too would vote for including specific standard names for raw measurements. We have already added some standard names which relate to the measurement and thing measured rather than to geophysical quantities, and it seems the logical
route to me.

Best wishes

Jonathan
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata


_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata


John

--------------
John Graybeal   <mailto:[email protected]>  -- 831-775-1956
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
Marine Metadata Interoperability Project: http://marinemetadata.org

_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to