For many (most in my world, which is more observational) applications, the 
information about the instrument orientations will not be absolute (most 
instruments can't measure their orientation that way because they don't know 
what the platform orientation is).

So not specifying whether it is absolute or relative in the name will lead to 
ambiguity (partially resolved by the definition, perhaps) and error.  I suggest 
the desired concept be reflected by the standard name, to minimize long term 
confusion.

john


On Oct 21, 2010, at 08:19, Aleksandar Jelenak wrote:

> Nan Galbraith said the following on 10/20/2010 11:18 AM:
>> Is it implicit in the proposal that, if there is orientation
>> information only at the instrument level, it's absolute, but if
>> there's also platform orientation, they need to be considered
>> together?
> 
> My idea is that both orientations are absolute, with the instrument-level 
> being considered more accurate. Thus if a file would ever contain both 
> "instrument_*" and "platform_*" standard names, better quality data would be 
> in "instrument_*" names variables.
> 
> One more idea that we discussed in my office was whether or not was 
> worthwhile to indicate platform attitude-corrected data (roll/yaw/pitch). 
> Something like appending "_with_attitude_correction" to the standard names. 
> In the end we decided not go with that because this approach would require 
> new names for latitude and longitude data and I did not think that would be 
> accepted.
> 
>       -Aleksandar
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata



John Graybeal   <mailto:jgrayb...@ucsd.edu> 
phone: 858-534-2162
System Development Manager
Ocean Observatories Initiative Cyberinfrastructure Project: 
http://ci.oceanobservatories.org
Marine Metadata Interoperability Project: http://marinemetadata.org   

_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to