Dear Olivier > number_content_of_icebergs (m-2) That is consistent with existing names and makes sense but it's a bit surprising, don't you think? Because icebergs are so large, it doesn't seem obvious to talk about the number content of them; that idea is more applicable to microscopic objects. It would feel more natural to me to name this number_of_icebergs_per_unit_area We already use the phrase per_unit_area in other names as well.
Cheers Jonathan _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
