Hi Jonathan:
On 4/14/2011 2:14 AM, Jonathan Gregory wrote:
Dear John and Steve
I agree with Steve about this:
On 04/13/2011 02:25 PM, John Caron wrote:
the point im trying to make is that it would be better to understand
that "mol mol-1" (canonical udunit = 1) is not the same as "m3 m-3"
(canonical udunit = 1).
In my opinion, the distinction between "mol/mol" and "m3/m3" is better
indicated by the name of the physical quantity being displayed rather
than by its unit attribute.
I would say mol mol-1 and m3 m-3 are actually the same unit. But that doesn't
mean the quantities with these units are the same. Similarly,
net_downward_longwave_flux_in_air and net_downward_shortwave_flux_in_air
are not the same quantity, even though they are both in W m-2.
yes, exactly.
A "physical quantities" library seperate from udunits could provide some
assistance in detecting when two quantities can be added with unit
convertsion, eg "add m and feet" but not "add mol/mol and m3/m3".
The udunits Unix command doesn't accept garbage garbage-1 as a valid unit,
and nor should the Java version, I think.
Thats good. I think the java library might be my fault, because I asked
Steve to allow "unknown units" as a half step towards a "physical
quantities" library. in retrospect, best to separate the two.
Regards,
John
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
