Karl (also verified by Rich) - thanks for the replies.  I was using the 
previous release of the cf-checker which throws errors rather than ignoring 
and/or reporting as "info".

Thanks!!

Chris

From: Karl Taylor <taylo...@llnl.gov<mailto:taylo...@llnl.gov>>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 15:21:18 -0400
To: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>" 
<cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>>
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] "Empty" Units attribute for dimensioned variables

Dear Chris,

Do you have the latest version of the checker?  Is the behavior you're seeing 
consistent with what is stated in the email copied below?

regards,
Karl

email from 3/1/11
Dear All,

I've made a couple of fixes to the CF checker:

1) If the variable is deemed unitless, then the checker will not flag an error 
if either units=1 or the units attribute is omitted.

2) Fix bug where the checker was incorrectly complaining about a missing units 
attribute on some dimensionless variables.

It's available for testing at:

http://puma.nerc.ac.uk/cgi-bin/cf-checker-2.0.3.pl

Let me know if you find any issues.  If all's well I'll copy it to the 'live' 
location on Friday.

Regards,
Ros.

On 5/18/11 12:10 PM, Christopher Mueller wrote:
Hi all,

I'm wondering if someone can help me sort out the most proper way to handle 
something.  I'm processing some datasets and validating them for CF compliance 
using the CF Checker and I'm running into a problem with variables that are NOT 
dimensionless, but still really don't have a "valid" unit.  For example:

For the dataset here:  
http://hfrnet.ucsd.edu:8080/thredds/dodsC/HFRNet/USEGC/6km/hourly/RTV

The "site_code" is missing a "units" attribute – but I'm stumped as to what it 
should be.  Another example in the same dataset is the "procParams" variable.

The nearest "solution" I could decipher is to assign the "units = 1", but that 
seems less than proper as that unit is (I believe) supposed to be reserved for 
fractions and the like.


Any thoughts/solutions someone might have would be much appreciated.

Best,
Chris
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to