Dear Martin > I don't think that it is necessary to further qualify "burned_area". If > you do an internet search for this term you always come up with hits related > to "wildfire" which would suggest that there is little ambiguity in this > term. I propose to add the vegetation fire relationship in the definition of > the term but keep the term short and concise.
Fair enough. Perhaps we should also add "burned" to the list of area_types. That supports, in particular, the possibility of a dimension which runs over different area types, and it could be useful to include burned area among them. Best wishes Jonathan _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
