Le 14/01/2013 17:21, Aleksandar Jelenak - NOAA Affiliate a écrit : > Dear Bruno, > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Bruno PIGUET <bruno.pig...@meteo.fr> wrote: >> I have one remark about "platform_azimuth_angle" >> >> I like this name and it correspond to usual navigation definition (as >> far as I can tell from my experience with airborne and shipborne >> measurements), but... >> >> There is already a standard name called "platform_orientation", whose >> definition seems to be the same, even if less precisely-worded : The >> platform orientation is the direction in which the "front" or >> longitudinal axis of the platform is pointing (not necessarily the same >> as the direction in which it is travelling, called platform_course). > > platform_orientation is not the same as platform_azimuth_angle. This > azimuth angle is related to measurements made by an instrument mounted > on a platform (satellite, ship, airplane, truck, etc.).
Sorry for looking dumb, but I don't see the difference (except that "platform_orientation" is not precisely defined). I'm currently producing CF files containing airborne measurements, and the parameter which is usually called "heading", which is in fact exactly defined as "platform_azimuth_angle", is qualified with "standard_name = platform orientation". Bruno. -- bruno.pig...@meteo.fr Équipe GMEI/TRAMM CNRM-GAME : UMR Meteo-France/CNRS n°3589 _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata