Hi Roy,

First off, i thought ICES tried to persuade you way before SDN that this was 
perhaps not the right approach ;)

Anyway, I would agree that the species entity needs to be separated from the 
'standard name'. I think discussions in SDN tech about the draft biological 
format for ODV would also highlight this as a 'must have'.

We did however struggle to understand entirely what you mean by having a 
separate metadata element related to species. What does the metadata element 
hang-off? If this was to be an attribute of the standard name, then I don't 
really understand how this decouples the relationship. But if you mean that you 
would have a variable 'Gadus morhua' that had an attribute 'aphiaID = xxx' then 
that would be logical.

Look forward to hearing what the intention is.

Best, Neil

From: sdn2-tech-requ...@listes.seadatanet.org 
[mailto:sdn2-tech-requ...@listes.seadatanet.org] On Behalf Of Lowry, Roy K.
Sent: 22. marts 2013 10:58
To: John Maurer; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Cc: sdn2-t...@listes.seadatanet.org
Subject: [sdn2-tech] RE: [CF-metadata] proposed standard names for Enterococcus 
and Clostridium perfringens

Dear All,

I see Pandora's Box opening before us.  I have been down the road of setting up 
my equivalent to Standard Names (the BODC Parameter Usage Vocabulary) with 
concepts that include specification of the biological entity, which is why I 
have a vocabulary with getting on for 30,000 concepts. So I have things like 
'Abundance of species X','Carbon biomass of species X', 'Nitrogen biomass of 
species X', 'Average specimen length of species X' and so on.

In recent discussions within SeaDataNet and the EU ODIP project I have been 
persuaded that this approach is unsustainable and that what we should be aiming 
for in these projects is an approach where the Standard Name equivalent is 
something like 'Abundance of biological entity' and then have a separate 
metadata element (i.e. variable attribute) for the biological entity that 
should be related an established taxonomic standard such as WoRMS 
(http://www.marinespecies.org/).  So, which path should CF follow?

An additional point is that I would prefer not to have the semantics of what 
was measured encoded into the units of measure.  The way I've approached CFU is 
through concepts phrased like ' Abundance (colony-forming units) of Vibrio 
cholerae (WoRMS 395085) per unit volume of the water body' where colony-forming 
units is a qualifying semantic on abundance (the term I prefer to 
number_concentration, but I appreciate the precedent in existing Standard 
Names).  So, IF we choose the path of naming the beasties in the standard name 
my preferred syntax would be:

cfu_number_concentration_of enterococcus _in_sea_water with canonical units of 
m-3 as John suggested.

I have copied this response to the SeaDataNet Technical Task Team so they are 
aware that this issue is being discussed in CF.

Cheers, Roy.

Please note that I now work part-time from Tuesday to Thursday.  E-mail 
response on other days is possible but not guaranteed!

From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of John 
Maurer
Sent: 21 March 2013 20:12
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] proposed standard names for Enterococcus and Clostridium 
perfringens

Aloha CF group,
I would like to propose the following standard names related to water quality 
measurements of the bacteria Enterococcus and Clostridium perfringens:

number_concentration_of_enterococcus_in_sea_water
number_concentration_of_clostridium_perfringens_in_sea_water

These are normally measured with units of CFU/100 mL, where CFU stands for 
Colony-Forming Units<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colony-forming_unit>. I 
believe the canonical units in UDUNITS parlance would translate to "m-3", which 
is what I find in the standard name table for other number_concentration_* 
quantities.

For descriptions of each, I would propose:

number_concentration_of_enterococcus_in_sea_water:

"Number concentration" means the number of particles or other specified objects 
per unit volume. In this context, it represents the number of colony-forming 
units (CFU) of bacteria belonging to the genus Enterococcus. This indicator 
bacteria has been correlated with the presence of human pathogens 
(disease-causing organisms) and therefore with human illnesses such as 
gastroenteritis, diarrhea, and various infections in epidemiological studies. 
As such, it is commonly measured in beach water quality monitoring programs.

number_concentration_of_clostridium_perfringens_in_sea_water:

"Number concentration" means the number of particles or other specified objects 
per unit volume. In this context, it represents the number of colony-forming 
units (CFU) of bacteria belonging to the species Clostridium perfringens. 
Because this bacteria is a normal component of the human intestinal tract, its 
presence in samples of sea water can be used as a tracer of sewage 
contamination. As such, it is commonly measured in beach water quality 
monitoring programs.

Thanks,
John Maurer
Pacific Islands Ocean Observing System (PacIOOS)
University of Hawaii at Manoa

________________________________
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject 
to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any 
reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under 
the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records 
management system.
________________________________
Denne mail er blevet scannet af http://www.comendo.com og indeholder ikke virus!
________________________________
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to