Dear Andreas > > The convention does not yet > > have a standard representation for satellite swath data. > > Is this something which might change? I could try to make an according > proposal, if you guys think this would be within the scope of the CF > convention. ...
> I will probably go for one single dimension, "observation", and then add > variables as I need, adhering to the conventions where they exist. I > would be interested in getting a standard representation for satellite > swath data into CF, to have my files as standards-conforming as possible. Perhaps this is a new kind of feature type, which ought to be added to section 9 of the standard. What do you think? So far, it is not clear to me what you need which cannot already be done with the existing conventions, but I may not have followed these emails closely enough. How does it differ from the feature types already defined? Cheers Jonathan _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
