I prefer
data_cutoff_time
as well

mark
________________________________
From: CF-metadata [cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] on behalf of Jim Biard 
[jbi...@cicsnc.org]
Sent: 30 October 2014 13:06
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] GRIB2 data cutoff

Mark,

I can't comment on usage, but I don't think '-' characters are allowed, so 
data_cutoff_time or data_cut_off_time are probably better choices. I like 
data_cutoff_time better, but that's just me.

Grace and peace,

Jim

On 10/30/14, 4:40 AM, Hedley, Mark wrote:
Please could any further objections to this proposal be raised, as I would like 
this entry added to the standard names list.

thank you
mark
________________________________
From: CF-metadata 
[cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu>] on 
behalf of Hedley, Mark 
[mark.hed...@metoffice.gov.uk<mailto:mark.hed...@metoffice.gov.uk>]
Sent: 02 October 2014 12:25
To: CF Metadata List
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] GRIB2 data cutoff

Hi Richard

I see no responses yet on prior art for this concept, perhaps it is not widely 
used in CF-netCDF.

If that is the case, may I suggest that a new standard_name is required to 
label such a coordinate?

perhaps
  data_cut-off_time
  s
  A datetime which defines the instant after which observational data for a
  forecast run is no longer included in that forecast, which may be different
  from the forecast_reference_time.

Please would the community provide a little feedback on whether this would be 
suitable for inclusion into the standard_names table?

thank you
mark


________________________________
From: CF-metadata 
[cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu>] on 
behalf of Hattersley, Richard 
[richard.hatters...@metoffice.gov.uk<mailto:richard.hatters...@metoffice.gov.uk>]
Sent: 23 September 2014 14:40
To: CF Metadata List
Subject: [CF-metadata] GRIB2 data cutoff

Hi everyone,

As a little “light relief” from the versioning discussion...

Does anyone have any prior art for representing the GRIB 2 concept of 
“hours/minutes of observational data cutoff after reference time” (as expressed 
in product definition template 4.0) within CF-netCDF?


Richard Hattersley  AVD  Expert Software Developer
Met Office  FitzRoy Road  Exeter  Devon  EX1 3PB  United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0)1392 885702  Fax: +44 (0)1392 885681
Email: 
richard.hatters...@metoffice.gov.uk<mailto:richard.hatters...@metoffice.gov.uk> 
 Website: www.metoffice.gov.uk<http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/>




_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata


--
[CICS-NC] <http://www.cicsnc.org/> Visit us on
Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/cicsnc>       Jim Biard
Research Scholar
Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites NC <http://cicsnc.org/>
North Carolina State University <http://ncsu.edu/>
NOAA's National Climatic Data Center <http://ncdc.noaa.gov/>
151 Patton Ave, Asheville, NC 28801
e: jbi...@cicsnc.org<mailto:jbi...@cicsnc.org>
o: +1 828 271 4900




_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to