Hi everyone,

Sean Gaffney from the British Oceanographic Data Centre here. Apologies if I'm 
posting this in the wrong place, but I could use some advice please.

I've been supplied with some numerical model data representing vertical and 
horizontal currents in 40 depth layers in the North Atlantic, as CF compliant 
files. The existing dimensions are longitude, latitude, model_level_number and 
time. However, I've also been supplied in the file with depth for each 3-D 
cell, but this has just been supplied as a normal variable.

This means that, if someone accesses the BODC model delivery portal, unless 
they explicitly select depth as an output parameter along with currents, they 
won't get the depth data, but just the model_level_number as an indicator of 
the vertical position of the model output in the water column. Feedback from 
some users is that actual depth values in metres are required to make full use 
of the current data, but that this can be lost by having to select depth as an 
independent additional variable.

I wondered could this potential problem be resolved by converting depth into a 
dimension in the netcdf files? I'm uncertain though of whether this will work 
as the values will be different in every grid point, and therefore I'd like 
advice on whether this is a wise or practical thing to do.

Many thanks

Sean Gaffney
BODC



  ________________________________
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject 
to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any 
reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under 
the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records 
management system.
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to