Hi again Hernan,

I was taking T and S as being constant, not trying to be prescriptive about 
computation algorithm.  Next proposal (based on a Wikipedia quote from Garcia 
et al 2006):
Apparent Oxygen Utilization (AOU) is the difference between the measured 
dissolved oxygen<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxygen> concentration and its 
equilibrium<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_equilibrium> 
saturation<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxygen_saturation> concentration in 
water with the same physical and chemical properties. Reference: Broecker, W. 
S. and T. H. Peng (1982), Tracers in the Sea, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, 
Palisades, N. Y.
Are you happier with that?

Cheers, Roy.

From: Hernan Garcia - NOAA Federal [mailto:hernan.gar...@noaa.gov]
Sent: 03 March 2015 16:37
To: Lowry, Roy K.
Cc: Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate; alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk; 
cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu; Tim Boyer - NOAA Federal
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: 
apparent_oxygen_utilization

Rigourously speaking, the O2 solubility in water involves an atmospheric 
pressure term, a temperature, and salinity terms which are all variables (See 
for example; Benson and Krause, 1984; Garcia and Gordon, 1992).  I would leave 
AOU at at the definition level and not how it should be computed. This 
definition of AOU is a LOT more complicated than most folks realize; my 2 
cents. I will leave it to you all to decide.

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Lowry, Roy K. 
<r...@bodc.ac.uk<mailto:r...@bodc.ac.uk>> wrote:
Hi Hernan,

Shouldn't you specifically mention that it's the oxygen solubility at 
atmospheric pressure?  I would also still like to keep the reference.

That would take us to:

Apparent Oxygen Utilization (AOU) is the difference between the oxygen 
solubility at a pressure of 1 atmosphere (101325 Pa) and the measured dissolved 
oxygen concentration in water. Reference: Broecker, W. S. and T. H. Peng 
(1982), Tracers in the Sea, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, N. Y.

Is that acceptable?

Cheers, Roy.

From: Hernan Garcia - NOAA Federal 
[mailto:hernan.gar...@noaa.gov<mailto:hernan.gar...@noaa.gov>]
Sent: 03 March 2015 16:11
To: Lowry, Roy K.
Cc: Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate; 
alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk<mailto:alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk>; 
cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>; Tim Boyer - NOAA 
Federal
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: 
apparent_oxygen_utilization

Hello,

Let me make the following suggestion for consideration. For simplicity, I 
suggest adopting the following definition:

Apparent Oxygen Utilization (AOU): The difference between the dissolved oxygen 
solubility and the measured dissolved oxygen concentration in water.

Thanks,

Hernan






On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Lowry, Roy K. 
<r...@bodc.ac.uk<mailto:r...@bodc.ac.uk>> wrote:
Hi Ajay,

To me, this doesn't differ significantly from Alison's words except it uses 
'parcel of water' rather than 'sea water' and 'in equilibrium with the 
atmosphere' rather than 'saturation at a pressure of one atmosphere'. My only 
problem is that CF definitions don't usually include units.  Like Nan, I also 
like the inclusion of the reference in Alison's definition.

Would everybody be happy with:

Apparent Oxygen Utilization (AOU) is defined as the difference between the 
solubility concentration of oxygen in equilibrium with the atmosphere at the 
temperature and salinity of a parcel of water and the observed dissolved oxygen 
concentration. It is used to estimate the change in dissolved oxygen in a 
parcel of water due to biological and chemical processes at depth since it left 
the surface. Reference: Broecker, W. S. and T. H. Peng (1982), Tracers in the 
Sea, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, N. Y.” I have deliberately 
included “in sea water” in the first sentence of the definition to make it 
clear that this is an oceanographic quantity.

We need to agree something. At the moment we seem to be doing everything 
possible to prevent this Standard Name being accepted!!!

Cheers, Roy.
________________________________________
From: Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate 
[ajay.krish...@noaa.gov<mailto:ajay.krish...@noaa.gov>]
Sent: 27 February 2015 16:32
To: Lowry, Roy K.; Hernan Garcia - NOAA Federal
Cc: alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk<mailto:alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk>; 
cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: 
apparent_oxygen_utilization

Hi Alison,

I had to defer this to to our subject matter expert, Hernan Garcia. His 
response is copied below. I am also including Hernan in this email now, just so 
that we're all on the same page, moving forward.

Apparent Oxygen Utilization (AOU) is defined as the difference between the 
solubility concentration of oxygen in equilibrium with the atmosphere at the 
temperature and salinity of a parcel of water and the observed dissolved oxygen 
concentration. It is used to estimate the change in dissolved oxygen in a 
parcel of water due to biological and chemical processes at depth since it left 
the surface. AOU and dissolved oxygen concentrations are nominally expressed in 
micro-moles per kilogram (umol kg^-1)


Thanks,
Ajay




On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:47 AM, Lowry, Roy K. 
<r...@bodc.ac.uk<mailto:r...@bodc.ac.uk><mailto:r...@bodc.ac.uk<mailto:r...@bodc.ac.uk>>>
 wrote:
Hello Alison,

Looks good to me.

Cheers, Roy.
________________________________________
From: 
alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk<mailto:alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk><mailto:alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk<mailto:alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk>>
 
[alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk<mailto:alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk><mailto:alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk<mailto:alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk>>]
Sent: 26 February 2015 18:11
To: Lowry, Roy K.; 
ajay.krish...@noaa.gov<mailto:ajay.krish...@noaa.gov><mailto:ajay.krish...@noaa.gov<mailto:ajay.krish...@noaa.gov>>;
 
cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu><mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>>
Subject: RE: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: 
apparent_oxygen_utilization

Dear Ajay, Roy, All,

Thank you for the clarification regarding units.

We are now settled on
apparent_oxygen_utilization (mol kg-1).

We do already have a couple of ocean biogeochemistry names referring to 
“nitrate utilization” so I think this new name is in keeping with those.

Based on the definition provided by Ajay and John Graybeal’s suggested wording, 
I have currently written the definition as:
“Apparent Oxygen Utilization (often abbreviated as AOU) is the difference 
between the saturation concentration of oxygen in sea water at a pressure of 1 
atmosphere (101325 Pa) and the observed oxygen concentration. It is used to 
estimate the change in oxygen concentration due to biological and chemical 
processes. Reference: Broecker, W. S. and T. H. Peng (1982), Tracers in the 
Sea, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, N. Y.” I have deliberately 
included “in sea water” in the first sentence of the definition to make it 
clear that this is an oceanographic quantity.

Does this all look OK? If so, then I think the name can be accepted for 
inclusion in the standard name table.

Best wishes,
Alison

------
Alison Pamment                                 Tel: +44 1235 
778065<tel:%2B44%201235%20778065><tel:%2B44%201235%20778065>
NCAS/Centre for Environmental Data Archival    Email: 
alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk<mailto:alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk><mailto:alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk<mailto:alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk>><mailto:j.a.pamm...@rl.ac.uk<mailto:j.a.pamm...@rl.ac.uk><mailto:j.a.pamm...@rl.ac.uk<mailto:j.a.pamm...@rl.ac.uk>>>
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
R25, 2.22
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.


From: CF-metadata 
[mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu><mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu>>]
 On Behalf Of Lowry, Roy K.
Sent: 26 February 2015 15:29
To: Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate; 
cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu><mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>>
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: 
apparent_oxygen_utilization

Hi Alison,

Just to clarify that I am in total agreement with this and had a bit of a 
senior moment in a previous message.

Cheers, Roy.

________________________________
From: Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate 
[ajay.krish...@noaa.gov<mailto:ajay.krish...@noaa.gov><mailto:ajay.krish...@noaa.gov<mailto:ajay.krish...@noaa.gov>>]
Sent: 26 February 2015 14:56
To: 
cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu><mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>><mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu><mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>>>
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: 
apparent_oxygen_utilization

Hi Alison,

Yes, please use mol kg-1 as the canonical unit.

Thanks,

Ajay

alison.pamment at 
stfc.ac.uk<http://stfc.ac.uk><http://stfc.ac.uk><http://stfc.ac.uk> 
alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk<http://stfc.ac.uk><http://stfc.ac.uk> 
<mailto:cf-metadata%40cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:cf-metadata%2540cgd.ucar.edu><mailto:cf-metadata%2540cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:cf-metadata%252540cgd.ucar.edu>>?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BCF-metadata%5D%20Request%20for%20new%0A%09standard-name%3A%09apparent_oxygen_utilization&In-Reply-To=%3C014539AC4976BE4490A360410A8C20178A2D6062%40EXCHMBX01.fed.cclrc.ac.uk<http://40EXCHMBX01.fed.cclrc.ac.uk><http://40EXCHMBX01.fed.cclrc.ac.uk>%3E>
Thu Feb 26 03:56:32 MST 2015

Dear All,



Thank you for the constructive discussion of this proposal - it seems that 
agreement has been reached on apparent_oxygen_utilisation with canonical units 
of mol kg-1. (Just to double check: is this the correct unit for use with the 
World Ocean Database, which I believe is the reason for requesting the name in 
the first place. Units of mol m-3 have also been mentioned in this discussion, 
but this could be a misunderstanding.



Best wishes,

Alison





________________________________
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject 
to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any 
reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under 
the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records 
management system.

This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject 
to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any 
reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under 
the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records 
management system.

This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject 
to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any 
reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under 
the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records 
management system.



--
Hernan E. Garcia, Ph.D.
NOAA NESDIS Program Coordination Officer
Office of the Under Secretary
1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Room 61021
Washington, DC 20230
Desk: (202) 482-1567<tel:%28202%29%20482-1567>
Cell: (301) 938-5895<tel:%28301%29%20938-5895>
E-mail: hernan.gar...@noaa.gov<mailto:hernan.gar...@noaa.gov>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The contents of this message are mine
personally and do not reflect any position
of the U.S. Government or NOAA
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

________________________________
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject 
to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any 
reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under 
the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records 
management system.



--
Hernan E. Garcia, Ph.D.
NOAA NESDIS Program Coordination Officer
Office of the Under Secretary
1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Room 61021
Washington, DC 20230
Desk: (202) 482-1567
Cell: (301) 938-5895
E-mail: hernan.gar...@noaa.gov<mailto:hernan.gar...@noaa.gov>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The contents of this message are mine
personally and do not reflect any position
of the U.S. Government or NOAA
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

________________________________
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject 
to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any 
reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under 
the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records 
management system.
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to