"Sea_surface_mole_concentration..." is a concentration (mol m-3).
> On Nov 4, 2016, at 5:18 AM, Lowry, Roy K. <r...@bodc.ac.uk> wrote: > > Dear John, > > > Following these comments, I now wonder a little more about your previous > comment on differences in dimensionality between your surface concentrations > and concentrations at depth. Could you clarify what the units of measure are > for your 2D simulations? Are they concentrations per unit area (e.g. mg/m2) > where the value represents an integration over depth or concentrations per > unit volume (e.g. mg/m3) where the value represents the concentration in the > surface water layer? > > > If it's the former then separate Standard Names are certainly required, but I > would say the wording would need tweaking to reflect the fact such as the > addition of 'integrated' or 'integral'. > > > Cheers, Roy. > > > Please note that I partially retired on 01/11/2015. I am now only working 7.5 > hours a week and can only guarantee e-mail response on Wednesdays, my day in > the office. All vocabulary queries should be sent to enquir...@bodc.ac.uk. > Please also use this e-mail if your requirement is urgent. > > > > > From: CF-metadata <cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu> on behalf of John Dunne > - NOAA Federal <john.du...@noaa.gov> > Sent: 04 November 2016 00:09 > To: alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk > Cc: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu; Stephen Griffies; gok...@ucar.edu; Durack, Paul > J. > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] New standard names for OMIP biogeochemistry and > chemistry > > Hi Alison and all, > > Sorry for the delay. I have been communicating with Jim Orr and Paul Durack > about your points, and have the following responses and proposal. I am not > sure what happens know, so please advise if you want to take the discussion > offline or have me put together a new revised spreadsheet. > > Thanks, John > >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:16 PM, <alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk> wrote: >> Dear Paul, Jim and Jonathan, >> >> Thank you for all the proposals for OMIP biogeochemistry and chemistry names >> and the discussion that has already begun on these. >> >> I have created entries for all the proposed names in the CEDA vocabulary >> editor, available here: >> http://cfeditor.ceda.ac.uk/proposals/1?status=active&namefilter=&proposerfilter=Durack&descfilter=&unitfilter=&yearfilter=&commentfilter=OMIP&filter+and+display=Filter. >> At the moment, the names themselves are all shown as originally proposed and >> I have added standard definition text for consistency with existing names. >> Please use the link to view the full list of names and definitions as it is >> easier than reproducing it all in an email to the list. >> >> I think a number of the names look fine and could be published in their >> current form (see item 1 below). Paul and Jim, please can you check the >> definitions that I'm suggesting for these names and let me know if you're >> happy with them? (Comments from others are of course welcome). >> >> For the groups of names where some discussion is still required my comments >> are in item 2. >> >> 1. Names that I think can be approved, subject to checking of the >> definitions. >> >> mole_concentration_of_bacteria_expressed_as_carbon_in_sea_water, mol m-3 >> mole_concentration_of_dissolved_molecular_oxygen_in_sea_water_at_saturation, >> mol m-3 >> mole_concentration_of_dissolved_inorganic_silicon_in_sea_water, mol m-3 >> tendency_of_mole_concentration_of_particulate_organic_matter_expressed_as_carbon_in_sea_water_due_to_grazing_of_phytoplankton, >> mol m-3 s-1 >> ocean_mass_content_of_dissolved_organic_carbon, kg m-2 >> ocean_mass_content_of_particulate_organic_matter_expressed_as_carbon, kg m-2 >> mole_concentration_of_cfc11_in_sea_water, mol m-3 >> mole_concentration_of_cfc12_in_sea_water, mol m-3 >> surface_downward_mole_flux_of_cfc11, mol m-2 s-1 >> surface_downward_mole_flux_of_cfc12, mol m-2 s-1 >> >> 2. Names requiring further discussion. >> >> a. Phosphorus names >> Sorry that I didn't notice it when previewing the names, but I have realized >> that 'phosphorus' is misspelled in the proposals, i.e., it should be >> 'phosphorus', not 'phosphorous'. Subject to this correction and checking of >> the definitions, I think the following names can be approved. >> mole_concentration_of_dissolved_inorganic_phosphorus_in_sea_water, mol m-3 >> tendency_of_ocean_mole_content_of_phosphorous_due_to_biological_production, >> mol m-2 s-1 >> >> I will also correct the spelling in three further phosphorus names which >> remain under discussion due to other issues: >> surface_mole_concentration_of_dissolved_inorganic_phosphorous_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3 >> surface_mole_concentration_of_particulate_organic_matter_expressed_as_phosphorus_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3 >> surface_mole_concentration_of_phytoplankton_expressed_as_phosphorus_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3 >> >> b. Definitions relating to new chemical species >> It is usual to include a sentence in the definition when a standard name >> refers to a chemical species. There are three new species/isotopes in the >> current set of proposals. I suggest adding a single sentence to the >> definitions of the relevant names as follows: >> >> carbon13: ' "carbon13" means the naturally occurring isotope of carbon >> having six protons and seven neutrons.' >> carbon14: ' "carbon14" means the radioactive isotope of carbon having six >> protons and eight neutrons, used in radiocarbon dating.' >> sulfur_hexafluoride: 'The chemical formula of sulfur hexafluoride is SF6.' >> >> OK? > > OK >> >> c. tendency_of_ocean_mole_content_of_[in]organic_carbon names >> >> My question here refers to the following five proposals: >> tendency_of_ocean_mole_content_of_inorganic_carbon, mol m-2 s-1 >> tendency_of_ocean_mole_content_of_inorganic_carbon_due_to_runoff_and_sediment_dissolution, >> mol m-2 s-1 >> tendency_of_ocean_mole_content_of_inorganic_carbon_due_to_runoff_and_sedimentation, >> mol m-2 s-1 >> tendency_of_ocean_mole_content_of_organic_carbon_due_to_runoff_and_sediment_dissolution, >> mol m-2 s-1 >> tendency_of_ocean_mole_content_of_organic_carbon_due_to_runoff_and_sedimentation, >> mol m-2 s-1 >> >> We have a couple of existing names for tendencies of inorganic carbon >> content, both of which are for dissolved_inorganic_carbon. Am I correct in >> thinking that your names also refer to dissolved amounts? If so, we should >> include it, e.g. tendency_of_ocean_mole_content_of_inorganic_carbon should >> be tendency_of_ocean_mole_content_of_dissolved_inorganic_carbon, and so on. > > These terms are intended to allow users to construct a complete carbon > budget, and were not intended to distinguish between particulate and > dissolved. Should we restrict the definitions and add more terms? add > "total" to the name before "inorganic"? Please note that the names listed > above with "sedimentation" are incorrect. As they are intended to represent > loss from the ocean, they should not have "runoff_and". Like in Paul's > spreadsheet, they should just be > "tendency_of_ocean_mole_content_of_inorganic_carbon_due_to_sedimentation" and > "tendency_of_ocean_mole_content_of_organic_carbon_due_to_sedimentation". > These are effectively both "particulate" since they just represent pelagic > sinking in current models to my knowledge, though it is possible that models > might include insitu benthic organic production and/or inorganic > precipitation which could be represented as a dissolved loss. Of course, > "sediment dissolution" would be just dissolved, but runoff could be either > particulate or dissolved... did you want to distinguish between them? > >> >> d. Surface concentration names >> There are a lot of these: 42 surface_mole_concentration names (units of mol >> m-3), 6 surface_mass_concentration names (kg m-3) and I'm also including 2 >> surface_sea_water_alkalinity (mol m-3) names and 3 surface_sea_water_ph >> names in this section. >> >> My concern about these proposals is that the names and units are not >> consistent. In CF standard names, "surface" means the lower boundary of the >> atmosphere. It has no depth, so it is not meaningful to regard it as having >> a mass or a volume. For this reason we can't assign units of kg m-3 or mol >> m-3 to a 'surface' name. I assume that all these quantities are in fact >> "near surface" values, i.e. representative of the top model layer, in which >> case there are two possible ways to deal with this. >> >> The first solution is simply to remove 'surface' from all these names and >> instead use a vertical coordinate or scalar coordinate and coordinate bounds >> to indicate the location and thickness of the layer. This has the advantage >> that many of the required names actually already exist, without the need to >> introduce separate surface names. E.g, instead of adding a new name >> surface_mole_concentration_of_dissolved_inorganic_carbon_in_sea_water, you >> could use the existing name >> mole_concentration_of_dissolved_inorganic_carbon_in_sea_water accompanied by >> suitable coordinate information to describe your quantity. >> >> The second solution, if you do feel that it is necessary to have distinct >> standard names for all these near-surface quantities, would be to follow the >> approach used in some existing sea_surface names such as >> sea_surface_temperature and sea_surface_salinity. The names would then be >> 'sea_surface' names and there would be an accompanying sentence in the >> definition to explain what that means, i.e. that it refers to water close to >> the surface. You would still also need to include the coordinate information >> and coordinate bounds to fully describe your data. With this approach the >> proposed name >> surface_mole_concentration_of_dissolved_inorganic_carbon_in_sea_water would >> become sea_surface_mole_concentration_of_dissolved_inorganic_carbon. >> >> Either solution would be consistent with the proposed units and I'd be happy >> with either. Please let me know how you prefer to proceed. >> >> As a final point in this section, the three proposed surface_sea_water_ph >> names are dimensionless, but I imagine that these too are really intended to >> represent the top model layer, in which case we should either drop 'surface' >> or change them to 'sea_surface' names too. > > While we are sensitive to your and Jonathan's point that it leads to > proliferation of variable names, we prefer the second option, particularly in > light of the variables that we are requesting daily as 2D sea surface and > monthly full 3D. If we are going to go this route, should these names be > "sea_surface_mass_concentration_of_phytoplankton_expressed_as_chlorophyll_in_sea_water", > or just > "sea_surface_mass_concentration_of_phytoplankton_expressed_as_chlorophyll" > >> >> e. Limitation names >> Jonathan has already raised the question of what 'limitation' means and also >> what measure of the various phytoplankton populations is being limited. This >> is a new concept in standard names so it's important to get the definitions >> right. >> >> John Dunne replied to Jonathan: >> > With respect to the limitation terms, we currently have the definitions >> > explained in the "Resolved Comment" column as "Ratio of realizable >> > miscellaneous other >> > phytoplankton growth rate under low nitrogen stress to theoretical rate >> > without such limitation". >> >> So from this, my understanding is that nitrogen and iron are nutrients whose >> availability promotes the growth of phytoplankton, presumably by being >> absorbed somehow into the organic matter, while solar irradiance is clearly >> the energy source essential to the photosynthesis reaction. John's reply >> talks about growth rate, so I assume that means the growth rate of the >> population of a particular species (as opposed to the growth rate of >> individuals of that species). > > Yes, it is a population-level metric. > >> >> Based on this I've attempted a couple of example definitions. If we can >> agree these, then I can go ahead and add the appropriate sentences to all >> the limitation names. >> nitrogen_limitation_of_diatoms (canonical units: 1) >> 'Diatoms are single-celled phytoplankton with an external skeleton made of >> silica. Phytoplankton are autotrophic prokaryotic or eukaryotic algae that >> live near the water surface where there is sufficient light to support >> photosynthesis. Nitrogen is a nutrient essential to the growth of >> phytoplankton populations. "Nitrogen limitation" means the ratio of the >> growth rate of a species population in the environment (where there is a >> finite availability of nitrogen) to the theoretical growth rate if there >> were no such limit on nitrogen availability.' > > >> >> N.B. For the irradiance names, I suggest we make them 'solar_irradiance' to >> be absolutely clear. >> solar_irradiance_limitation_of_miscellaneous_phytoplankton (canonical >> units:1) >> 'Phytoplankton are autotrophic prokaryotic or eukaryotic algae that live >> near the water surface where there is sufficient light to support >> photosynthesis. "Miscellaneous phytoplankton" are all those phytoplankton >> that are not diatoms, diazotrophs, calcareous phytoplankton, >> picophytoplankton or other separately named components of the phytoplankton >> population. "Irradiance" means the power per unit area (called radiative >> flux in other standard names), the area being normal to the direction of >> flow of the radiant energy. Solar irradiance is essential to the >> photosynthesis reaction and its presence promotes the growth of >> phytoplankton populations. "Solar irradiance limitation" means the ratio of >> the growth rate of a species population in the environment (where the amount >> of sunlight reaching a location may be limited) to the theoretical growth >> rate if there were no such limit on solar irradiance.' >> > > > If you think this level of detail is necessary, I am fine with it, though I'm > not sure where it is being proposed the be entered (the comment?) it seems > inconsistent with the lack of detail on most variables. Editorially, I think > adding the fact that they are "single celled", and "prokaryotic or > eukaryotic" seem superfluous (e.g. the models intend to represent > diazotrophs, diatoms, and others groups even when they form chains)", and > "live near the water surface" would probably be better as simply "grow". > >> Comments and suggestions for improvement are welcome! >> >> f. Natural/abiotic component names >> Thank you for the useful discussion that has already taken place about the >> 22 proposed natural_component and abiotic_component names. I hadn't >> previously understood the details of how the OMIP experiments will be run. >> >> Reading through the discussion, I agree with Jonathan that the >> natural_component names seem to be describing the forcing conditions for the >> model, rather than being a separate set of diagnostics that represent the >> effects of some process within the model. Hence I agree that it isn't >> necessary to define separate standard names with due_to_natural_component >> and I'd advocate leaving them out. Is that OK? > > I agree that the "due_to_natural_component" reference is potentially > misleading. In the simplest models it is envisioned as a separate tracer in > the same run - in the more complex BGC models where the biological > interactions are pH and/or saturation sensitive - such a tracer is an > approximation (analogue) of what one would get in a full control run, thus > give the moniker of the "natural" >> >> I think we're agreed that the abiotic names are needed, and if I've >> understood correctly we seem to have agreed to stick with >> due_to_abiotic_component because it works for all the names where it's used, >> including ph names. Is that right? > > Like for "natural", this is only an analogue of what would otherwise be a > solubility-driven tracer. To identify these as separate tracers more > clearly, I propose changing the comment and standard names to the following: > > "Dissolved inorganic carbon (CO3+HCO3+H2CO3) concentration natural analogue > forced by preindustrial atmospheric xCO2" > mole_concentration_of_dissolved_inorganic_carbon_natural_analogue_in_sea_water > > "Dissolved inorganic carbon (CO3+HCO3+H2CO3) concentration abiotic analogue > ignoring biological effects on carbon and alkalinity" > mole_concentration_of_dissolved_inorganic_carbon_abiotic_analogue_in_sea_water > > Does that make more sense? > >> >> Best wishes, >> Alison >> >> ------ >> Alison Pamment Tel: >> +44 1235 778065 >> Centre for Environmental Data Analysis Email: >> alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk >> STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory >> R25, 2.22 >> Harwell Campus, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K. >> >> >> From: Durack, Paul J. [mailto:dura...@llnl.gov] >> Sent: 28 September 2016 19:12 >> To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu >> Cc: Pamment, Alison (STFC,RAL,RALSP); John Dunne - NOAA Federal; James Orr; >> Stephen Griffies - NOAA Federal; gok...@ucar.edu >> Subject: New standard names for OMIP biogeochemistry and chemistry >> >> Hi folks, >> >> In preparation for the upcoming CMIP6-OMIP experiments we have a number of >> new standard names we'd like "blessed" for the biogeochemistry and chemistry >> data request. >> >> I have appended these below. For folks interested, further information and >> notes are contained in the linked google sheets both indicated below. Many >> thanks to Alison for taking a first pass at these before sending to the >> mailing list. >> >> The format below for the new names is: >> standard_name_being_requested, units, (google sheet tab(s) and line >> number(s)). >> >> *** >> 160928 1105 dur...@llnl.gov >> >> Biogeochemistry see >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HFYLi9mEypLdos7IG07Rv5XqBLyQ9r_thiKaulIjfbw/edit: >> >> mole_concentration_of_dissolved_inorganic_carbon_in_sea_water_due_to_natural_component, >> mol m-3, (Oyr, 6; Omon, 61) >> mole_concentration_of_dissolved_inorganic_carbon_in_sea_water_due_to_abiotic_component, >> mol m-3, (Oyr, 7; Omon, 62) >> mole_concentration_of_dissolved_inorganic_carbon14_in_sea_water, mol m-3, >> (Oyr, 8; Omon, 63) >> mole_concentration_of_dissolved_inorganic_carbon13_in_sea_water, mol m-3, >> (Oyr, 9; Omon, 64) >> mole_concentration_of_bacteria_expressed_as_carbon_in_sea_water, mol m-3, >> (Oyr, 13; Omon, 68) >> sea_water_alkalinity_expressed_as_mole_equivalent_due_to_natural_component, >> mol m-3, (Oyr, 27; Omon, 81) >> sea_water_ph_reported_on_total_scale_due_to_natural_component, 1, (Oyr, 29; >> Omon, 83) >> sea_water_ph_reported_on_total_scale_due_to_abiotic_component, 1, (Oyr, 30; >> Omon, 84) >> mole_concentration_of_dissolved_molecular_oxygen_in_sea_water_at_saturation, >> mol m-3, (Oyr, 32; Omon, 86) >> mole_concentration_of_dissolved_inorganic_phosphorous_in_sea_water, mol m-3, >> (Oyr, 35; Omon, 89) >> mole_concentration_of_dissolved_inorganic_silicon_in_sea_water, mol m-3, >> (Oyr, 37; Omon, 91) >> mole_concentration_of_natural_carbonate_expressed_as_carbon_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3, (Oyr, 55; Omon, 108) >> mole_concentration_of_abiotic_carbonate_expressed_as_carbon_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3, (Oyr, 56; Omon, 109) >> mole_concentration_of_carbonate_expressed_as_carbon_for_sea_water_in_equilibrium_with_pure_calcite, >> mol m-3, (Oyr, 57; Omon, 110) >> mole_concentration_of_carbonate_expressed_as_carbon_for_sea_water_in_equilibrium_with_pure_aragonite, >> mol m-3, (Oyr, 58; Omon, 111) >> tendency_of_mole_concentration_of_particulate_organic_matter_expressed_as_carbon_in_sea_water_due_to_remineralization, >> mol m-3 s-1, (Oyr, 75) >> tendency_of_mole_concentration_of_particulate_organic_matter_expressed_as_carbon_in_sea_water_due_to_grazing_of_phytoplankton, >> mol m-3 s-1, (Oyr, 96; Omon, 113) >> surface_downward_mass_flux_of_carbon_dioxide, kg m-2 s-1, (Oyr, 100) >> surface_downward_mass_flux_of_carbon_dioxide_expressed_as_carbon_due_to_natural_component, >> kg m-2 s-1, (Oyr, 101; Omon, 163) >> surface_downward_mass_flux_of_carbon_dioxide_expressed_as_carbon_due_to_abiotic_component, >> kg m-2 s-1, (Oyr, 102; Omon, 164) >> surface_downward_mass_flux_of_carbon14_dioxide_expressed_as_carbon_due_to_abiotic_component, >> kg m-2 s-1, (Oyr, 103; Omon, 165) >> surface_downward_mass_flux_of_carbon13_dioxide_expressed_as_carbon_due_to_abiotic_component, >> kg m-2 s-1, (Oyr, 104; Omon, 166) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_dissolved_inorganic_carbon_in_sea_water, mol >> m-3, (Omon, 7) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_dissolved_inorganic_carbon_in_sea_water_due_to_natural_component, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 8) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_dissolved_inorganic_carbon_in_sea_water_due_to_abiotic_component, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 9) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_dissolved_inorganic_carbon14_in_sea_water, mol >> m-3, (Omon, 10) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_dissolved_inorganic_carbon13_in_sea_water, mol >> m-3, (Omon, 11) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_dissolved_organic_carbon_in_sea_water, mol >> m-3, (Omon, 12) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_phytoplankton_expressed_as_carbon_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 13) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_zooplankton_expressed_as_carbon_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 14) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_bacteria_expressed_as_carbon_in_sea_water, mol >> m-3, (Omon, 15) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_organic_detritus_expressed_as_carbon_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 16) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_calcite_expressed_as_carbon_in_sea_water, mol >> m-3, (Omon, 17) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_aragonite_expressed_as_carbon_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 18) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_diatoms_expressed_as_carbon_in_sea_water, mol >> m-3, (Omon, 19) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_diazotrophs_expressed_as_carbon_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 20) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_calcareous_phytoplankton_expressed_as_carbon_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 21) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_picophytoplankton_expressed_as_carbon_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 22) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_miscellaneous_phytoplankton_expressed_as_carbon_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 23) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_microzooplankton_expressed_as_carbon_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 24) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_mesozooplankton_expressed_as_carbon_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 25) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_miscellaneous_zooplankton_expressed_as_carbon_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 26) >> surface_sea_water_alkalinity_expressed_as_mole_equivalent, mol m-3, (Omon, >> 27) >> surface_sea_water_alkalinity_expressed_as_mole_equivalent_due_to_natural_component, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 28) >> surface_sea_water_ph_reported_on_total_scale, 1, (Omon, 29) >> surface_sea_water_ph_reported_on_total_scale_due_to_natural_component, 1, >> (Omon, 30) >> surface_sea_water_ph_reported_on_total_scale_due_to_abiotic_component, 1, >> (Omon, 31) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_dissolved_molecular_oxygen_in_sea_water, mol >> m-3, (Omon, 32) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_dissolved_molecular_oxygen_in_sea_water_at_saturation, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 33) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_nitrate_in_sea_water, mol m-3, (Omon, 34) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_ammonium_in_sea_water, mol m-3, (Omon, 35) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_dissolved_inorganic_phosphorous_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 36) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_dissolved_iron_in_sea_water, mol m-3, (Omon, >> 37) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_dissolved_inorganic_silicon_in_sea_water, mol >> m-3, (Omon, 38) >> surface_mass_concentration_of_phytoplankton_expressed_as_chlorophyll_in_sea_water, >> kg m-3, (Omon, 39) >> surface_mass_concentration_of_diatoms_expressed_as_chlorophyll_in_sea_water, >> kg m-3, (Omon, 40) >> surface_mass_concentration_of_diazotrophs_expressed_as_chlorophyll_in_sea_water, >> kg m-3, (Omon, 41) >> surface_mass_concentration_of_calcareous_phytoplankton_expressed_as_chlorophyll_in_sea_water, >> kg m-3, (Omon, 42) >> surface_mass_concentration_of_picophytoplankton_expressed_as_chlorophyll_in_sea_water, >> kg m-3, (Omon, 43) >> surface_mass_concentration_of_miscellaneous_phytoplankton_expressed_as_chlorophyll_in_sea_water, >> kg m-3, (Omon, 44) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_particulate_organic_matter_expressed_as_nitrogen_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 45) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_particulate_organic_matter_expressed_as_phosphorous_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 46) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_particulate_organic_matter_expressed_as_iron_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 47) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_particulate_organic_matter_expressed_as_silicon_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 48) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_phytoplankton_expressed_as_nitrogen_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 49) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_phytoplankton_expressed_as_phosphorous_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 50) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_phytoplankton_expressed_as_iron_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 51) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_phytoplankton_expressed_as_silicon_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 52) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_dimethyl_sulfide_in_sea_water, mol m-3, (Omon, >> 53) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_carbonate_expressed_as_carbon_in_sea_water, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 54) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_carbonate_expressed_as_carbon_in_sea_water_due_to_natural_component, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 55) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_carbonate_expressed_as_carbon_in_sea_water_due_to_abiotic_component, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 56) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_carbonate_expressed_as_carbon_for_sea_water_in_equilibrium_with_pure_calcite, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 57) >> surface_mole_concentration_of_carbonate_expressed_as_carbon_for_sea_water_in_equilibrium_with_pure_aragonite, >> mol m-3, (Omon, 58) >> nitrogen_limitation_of_diatoms, 1, (Omon, 116) >> nitrogen_limitation_of_diazotrophs, 1, (Omon, 117) >> nitrogen_limitation_of_calcareous_phytoplankton, 1, (Omon, 118) >> nitrogen_limitation_of_picophytoplankton, 1, (Omon, 119) >> nitrogen_limitation_of_miscellaneous_phytoplankton, 1, (Omon, 120) >> irradiance_limitation_of_diatoms, 1, (Omon, 121) >> irradiance_limitation_of_diazotrophs, 1, (Omon, 122) >> irradiance_limitation_of_calcareous_phytoplankton, 1, (Omon, 123) >> irradiance_limitation_of_picophytoplankton, 1, (Omon, 124) >> irradiance_limitation_of_miscellaneous_phytoplankton, 1, (Omon, 125) >> iron_limitation_of_diatoms, 1, (Omon, 126) >> iron_limitation_of_diazotrophs, 1, (Omon, 127) >> iron_limitation_of_calcareous_phytoplankton, 1, (Omon, 128) >> iron_limitation_of_picophytoplankton, 1, (Omon, 129) >> iron_limitation_of_miscellaneous_phytoplankton, 1, (Omon, 130) >> tendency_of_ocean_mole_content_of_nitrogen_due_to_biological_production, mol >> m-2 s-1, (Omon, 139) >> tendency_of_ocean_mole_content_of_phosphorous_due_to_biological_production, >> mol m-2 s-1, (Omon, 140) >> ocean_mass_content_of_dissolved_organic_carbon, kg m-2, (Omon, 153) >> ocean_mass_content_of_particulate_organic_matter_expressed_as_carbon, kg >> m-2, (Omon, 154) >> surface_partial_pressure_of_carbon_dioxide_in_sea_water_due_to_natural_component, >> Pa, (Omon, 156) >> surface_partial_pressure_of_carbon_dioxide_in_sea_water_due_to_abiotic_component, >> Pa, (Omon, 157) >> surface_carbon_dioxide_partial_pressure_difference_between_sea_water_and_air_due_to_natural_component, >> Pa, (Omon, 159) >> surface_carbon_dioxide_partial_pressure_difference_between_sea_water_and_air_due_to_abiotic_component, >> Pa, (Omon, 160) >> tendency_of_ocean_mole_content_of_inorganic_carbon_due_to_runoff_and_sediment_dissolution, >> mol m-2 s-1, (Omon, 169) >> tendency_of_ocean_mole_content_of_inorganic_carbon_due_to_runoff_and_sedimentation, >> mol m-2 s-1, (Omon, 170) >> tendency_of_ocean_mole_content_of_organic_carbon_due_to_runoff_and_sediment_dissolution, >> mol m-2 s-1, (Omon, 171) >> tendency_of_ocean_mole_content_of_organic_carbon_due_to_runoff_and_sedimentation, >> mol m-2 s-1, (Omon, 172) >> >> >> Chemistry see >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1SfxHKASSwLbPM6xBDjZ6Y8oIxx9APLOlCG9G0lzIu7o/edit: >> >> mole_concentration_of_sulfur_hexafluoride_in_sea_water, mol m-3, (Oyr, 3; >> Omon, 4) >> mole_concentration_of_cfc11_in_sea_water, mol m-3, (Oyr, 4; Omon, 5) >> mole_concentration_of_cfc12_in_sea_water, mol m-3, (Oyr, 5; Omon, 6) >> surface_downward_mole_flux_of_sulfur_hexafluoride, mol m-2 s-1, (Omon, 9) >> surface_downward_mole_flux_of_cfc11, mol m-2 s-1, (Omon, 10) >> surface_downward_mole_flux_of_cfc12, mol m-2 s-1, (Omon, 11) >> *** >> >> Cheers, >> >> P > > This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject > to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any > reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release > under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic > records management system.
_______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
