Dear Alison, Robert, 6 & 7: In the sentence "If the diffuse radiation is isotropic, this term [i.e.surface_diffuse_shortwave_hemispherical_reflectance] is equivalent to the integral of surface_bidirectional_reflectance over all incident angles and over all outgoing angles in the hemisphere above the surface", I did mean isotropic in the sense of the diffuse radiation being of equal strength in all directions. I'd be glad if Robert could confirm or correct my interpretation of the relationship between surface_diffuse_shortwave_hemispherical_reflectance and surface_bidirectional_reflectance. My reasoning is that diffuse radiation is not necessarily isotropic, and if it is not the hemispherical reflectance will differ from a simple average of the bidirectional reflectance. I would like to have some explanation of the relationship between the two terms as I feel that it contributes to the clarify of the definition.
11. The asymmetry refers to the scattering phase function asymmetry, so how about scattering_asymmetry_factor_of_ambient_aerosol_particles ? regards, Martin ________________________________ From: CF-metadata <cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu> on behalf of Alison Pamment - UKRI STFC <alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk> Sent: 20 June 2018 12:53 To: CF-metadata (cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu) Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard names for RFMIP and GeoMIP Forwarding this message to the list. ------ Alison Pamment Tel: +44 1235 778065 NCAS/Centre for Environmental Data Archival Email: alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory R25, 2.22 Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K. -----Original Message----- From: Pamment, Alison (STFC,RAL,RALSP) Sent: 20 June 2018 12:49 To: Juckes, Martin (STFC,RAL,RALSP) <martin.juc...@stfc.ac.uk>; Robert Pincus <robert.pin...@colorado.edu>; Karl Taylor <taylo...@llnl.gov> Subject: RE: [CF-metadata] Standard names for RFMIP and GeoMIP Dear Martin, Robert, Karl, Thank you for commenting on these names - I think we are making good progress. > 6 & 7 Reflectances > I thought I saw an email yesterday from Robert confirming Karl's > opinion that we should not use albedo for reflectance in a particular > wavelength band. I can't find that email today, but I believe it just > confirmed Karl's point. Another way of stating the difference is that the > hemispherical reflectance at any wavelength is the outgoing radiant heat flow > divided by the incoming radiant heat flow, and averaging this ratio over > wavelengths is not, in general, going to give the same result as the ratio of > the averaged outgoing heat flow to the averaged incoming heat flow. > > We can, I think, exploit existing terms to clarify the definition of > these new terms: for the diffuse case, do we have the fraction of r which is > reflected? It would then make sense, I think, to name it > "surface_diffuse_shortwave_hemispherical_reflectance". > > There is clearly some relationship to the exist term > surface_bidirectional_reflectance. Is it correct to say that the new term is > the average of surface_bidirectional_reflectance over all incoming and > outgoing angles in the hemisphere if, and only if, the diffuse radiation if > isotropic? > > If so, I suggest the following modified description: > 'The surface called "surface" means the lower boundary of the > atmosphere. "Diffuse" radiation is radiation that has been scattered > by particles in the atmosphere such as cloud droplets and aerosols. > The term "shortwave" means shortwave radiation. Hemispherical > reflectance is the ratio of the energy of the reflected to the > incident radiation. This term gives the fraction of the > surface_diffuse_downwelling_shortwave_flux_in_air which is reflected. If the > diffuse radiation is isotropic, this term is equivalent to the integral of > surface_bidirectional_reflectance over all incident angles and over all > outgoing angles in the hemisphere above the surface. A coordinate variable of > radiation_wavelength or radiation_frequency can be used to specify the > wavelength or frequency, respectively, of the radiation. Shortwave > hemispherical reflectance is related to albedo, but albedo is defined in > terms of the fraction of the full spectrum of incident solar radiation which > is reflected. It is related to the hemispherical reflectance averaged over > all wavelengths using a weighting proportional to the incident heat flux.' This version of the name looks good - we haven't used 'hemispherical' as a term before, but I agree that it makes more sense than 'spherical' in the case of a reflectance. Thank you for improving the definition - it is good to explain the difference between albedo and reflectance. There are journal papers that describe methods for estimating surface albedo by integrating bidirectional reflectance measured from satellites viewing from many angles, so it would certainly seem reasonable to say that integrating that quantity over all directions would give a hemispherical reflectance. What exactly is meant by describing the diffuse radiation as 'isotropic'? Certainly it would be coming from all directions in the hemisphere - are we also implying that the intensity of the radiation needs to be the same in all directions for the relationship between bidirectional reflectance and hemispherical reflectance to be true? This name is still under discussion. > The corresponding "direct" term would be: > surface_direct_shortwave_hemispherical_reflectance. I've tried to > explain how this relates to 'The surface called "surface" means the lower > boundary of the atmosphere. "Direct" (also known as "beam") radiation is > radiation that has followed a direct path from the sun and is alternatively > known as "direct insolation". The term "shortwave" means shortwave radiation. > Hemispherical reflectance is the ratio of the energy of the reflected to the > incident radiation. > This term gives the fraction of the > surface_direct_downwelling_shortwave_flux_in_air which is reflected. > It is equivalent to the surface_bidirectional_reflectance at the > incident angle of the incoming solar radiation and integrated over all > outgoing angles in the hemisphere above the surface. A coordinate > variable of radiation_wavelength or radiation_frequency can be used to > specify the wavelength or frequency, respectively, of the radiation. > Shortwave hemispherical reflectance is related to albedo, but albedo is > defined in terms of the fraction of the full spectrum of incident solar > radiation which is reflected. It is related to the hemispherical reflectance > averaged over all wavelengths using a weighting proportional to the incident > heat flux.' Again this looks good - thank you for providing a clear definition. This name is accepted for inclusion in the standard name table and will be added in the July 2nd update. 8. CMIP6 short name sol. For this quantity we have agreed to use the existing name toa_incoming_shortwave_flux (W m-2) 'The abbreviation "toa" means top of atmosphere. The term "shortwave" means shortwave radiation. The TOA incoming shortwave flux is the radiative flux from the sun i.e. the "downwelling" TOA shortwave flux. In accordance with common usage in geophysical disciplines, "flux" implies per unit area, called "flux density" in physics.' I will add the sentence 'A coordinate variable of radiation_wavelength or radiation_frequency can be used to specify the wavelength or frequency, respectively, of the radiation' to allow the use of wavelength as a dimension to describe bands. 9. CMIP6 short name aerext. For this quantity we have agreed to use the existing name volume_extinction_coefficient_in_air_due_to_ambient_aerosol_particles (1). I will add the sentence 'The scattering/absorption/attenuation/extinction coefficient is assumed to be an integral over all wavelengths unless a coordinate of "radiation_wavelength" or "radiation_frequency" is included to specify the wavelength' to the definition. This will allow the use of the bands dimension and make the definition consistent with those of other existing radiative coefficient names. > 10. CMIP6 short name aerssa. For this quantity we have agreed to use the existing name single_scattering_albedo_in_air_due_to_ambient_aerosol_particles (1). > 11. Asymmetry factor For the asymmetry factor, Robert has confirmed that this is the quantity wanted rather than the backscatter fraction, so the definition needs to be modified slightly: asymmetry_factor_of_ambient_aerosol_particles Does the following work? The asymmetry factor is the angular integral of the aerosol scattering phase function weighted by the cosine of the angle with the incident radiation flux. The asymmetry coefficient is assumed to be an integral over all wavelengths, unless a coordinate of radiation_wavelength is included to specify the wavelength. "Aerosol" means the system of suspended liquid or solid particles in air (except cloud droplets) and their carrier gas, the air itself. "Ambient_aerosol" means that the aerosol is measured or modelled at the ambient state of pressure, temperature and relative humidity that exists in its immediate environment. "Ambient aerosol particles" are aerosol particles that have taken up ambient water through hygroscopic growth. The extent of hygroscopic growth depends on the relative humidity and the composition of the particles. To specify the relative humidity and temperature at which the quantity described by the standard name applies, provide scalar coordinate variables with sta ndard names of "relative_humidity" and "air_temperature". Thank you for clarifying the definition of this quantity. I think we should say in the name what the asymmetry factor refers to - it could be describing the shape of the particle, for example, but here we are talking about radiative properties. Would radiative_asymmetry_factor_of_ambient_aerosol_particles be acceptable? This name is still under discussion. Best wishes, Alison ------ Alison Pamment Tel: +44 1235 778065 NCAS/Centre for Environmental Data Archival Email: alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory R25, 2.22 Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K. ________________________________________ From: Robert Pincus <mailto:robert.pin...@colorado.edu> Sent: 14 June 2018 07:33 To: Juckes, Martin (STFC,RAL,RALSP) Cc: Pamment, Alison (STFC,RAL,RALSP) Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard names for RFMIP and GeoMIP Martin - We do want the asymmetry parameter using the cosine-weighted integral; I'm sorry if we have implied differently. The standard name asymmetry_factor_of_ambient_aerosol_particles would be perfect.What we want is results only for ambient aerosol. To inform future requests, yes, it would be sensible to ask for combinations such as e.g. asymmetry_factor_of_ambient_aerosol_particles_and_clouds . Combining asymmetry factors is unambiguous if one also knows the optical depth and single-scattering albedo of each component. - Robert > On Jun 13, 2018, at 1:22 PM, Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC > <mailto:martin.juc...@stfc.ac.uk> wrote: > > Dear Robert, > > > we have a question about the RFMIP variable "aerasymbnd" for which you > requested the standard name > > volume_spectral_asymmetry_factor_in_air_due_to_ambient_aerosol_particles. > > Markus Fiebig commented that the definition you gave, which refers to > the ratio of backscattered to forward scattered radiation, usually > goes under the name "backscatter fraction", rather than asymmetry > factor, which is a cosine weighted integral (see > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2015/058422.html).<h > ttp://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2015/058422.html)> > > Which do you want, asymmetry factor or backscatter fraction? > > The phrase "X_due_to_Y" in a standard name implies that there is a quantity > "X" which can be written as a sum of terms due to "Y" and other processes. > Here, it looks to me as though we are looking at a property of the aerosol > particles, so asymmetry_factor_of_ambient_aerosol_particles may be more > appropriate. For the quantity which you want here, does it make sense to add > contributions from different sources, e.g. asymmetry factor due to aerosol + > asymmetry factor due to cloud ice? > > regards, > Martin > > > ________________________________ > From: Juckes, Martin (STFC,RAL,RALSP) > Sent: 13 June 2018 13:09 > To: Pamment, Alison (STFC,RAL,RALSP); CF-metadata > (mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu) > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard names for RFMIP and GeoMIP > > > Dear Alison, > > > Thank you for reviewing all these. The "_clear_sky_and_no_aerosol" names look > good. > > > 6. & 7. > > For the albedo terms: You are right about "spectral": this was included > because the CMIP6 variables which need this standard name are requested in > spectral frequency bands, but the term requested is an albedo, not an albedo > per unit wave-number. > > > I believe that "spherical" and "hemispherical" have distinct meanings when > applied to radiation terms. From ISO 9288-1996 ["Thermal insulation - Heat > transfer by radiation .."]: "hemispherical" is used for quantities which "are > related to all directions along which a surface element can emit or receive > radiation", which I think applies here. Spherical irradiance refers to the > total irradiance incident on a point from all angles. Hence, I think we > should stay with hemispherical reflectance. On the other hand, "surface > hemispherical reflectance" and "surface albedo" appear to mean the same > thing, and we already have "surface_albedo", so it may be better to use that > phrase here. I had not looked into this enough before, so thank you for > querying the original suggestion. > > > The surface_albedo term makes no reference to the wavelength at which it > should be calculated, but I believe that it is generally considered to be a > quantity associated with shortwave radiation. Hence, I suggest we can drop > this qualifier -- but only if everyone agrees that surface_albedo should, at > least by default, apply to solar radiation. > > > Finally, "downwelling" is redundant here, since it is implicit in the > definition of surface albedo. After these simplifying assumptions, we could > use: > direct_surface_albedo > and > diffuse_surface_albedo. > > 8: > Yes, this the associated CMIP6 variable is the total incoming shortwave flux > in bands, so a new name is not needed. > > 9 & 10 > volume_extinction_coefficient_in_air_due_to_ambient_aerosol_particles and > single_scattering_albedo_in_air_due_to_ambient_aerosol_particles: I agree. > > 11 > aerasym: > volume_spectral_asymmetry_factor_in_air_due_to_ambient_aerosol_particl > es "asymmetry factor" and "backscatter fraction" appear to be two well > defined terms. I'll check with Robert Pincus to see which one he wants. > > Looking at this again, I'm concerned that the use of "due_to_" is not > entirely correct here: both "asymmetry factor" and "backscatter fraction" are > properties of the particles ... I don't think it is part of an additive > collection of terms which the use of "due_to" appears to imply. Hence, > accepting your comments about "volume" and "spectral", I suggest: > asymmetry_factor_of_ambient_aerosol_particles or > backscatter_fraction_of_ambient_aerosol_particles > > regards, > Martin > > ________________________________ > Alison Pamment - UKRI STFCalison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk > <mailto:cf-metadata%40cgd.ucar.edu?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BCF-metadata%5D%2 > 0Standard%20names%20for%20RFMIP%20and%20GeoMIP&In-Reply-To=%3C04077437 > e52b4933b728cab42bbb9017%40stfc.ac.uk%3E> > Thu May 31 12:31:51 MDT 2018 > > * Previous message (by thread): [CF-metadata] Precipitation >fractions for LS3MIP ><http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2018/060304.html> > * Next message (by thread): [CF-metadata] Standard name table and >standardized region list updated ><http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2018/060271.html> > * Messages sorted by: [ date >]<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2018/date.html#6027 >0> [ thread >]<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2018/thread.html#60 >270> [ subject >]<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2018/subject.html#6 >0270> [ author >]<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2018/author.html#60 >270> > > ________________________________ > > Dear All, > > Standard names were proposed some time ago for CMIP6 RFMIP and some of the > names received a small amount of discussion back in 2016. However, none of > the names were published at that time. Three names were proposed for GeoMIP > as long ago as 2015, but strangely, although I have a copy of the GeoMIP > email (which was addressed to the mailing list) it seems never to have > actually appeared on the list. The RFMIP and GeoMIP quantities are similar, > so I will address both in this message. I would particularly like some advice > on RFMIP proposals 6 - 11. > > GeoMIP > > 1. stratosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_ambient_aerosol_particles (1) > The same quantity was recently proposed for PMIP and added in Version 53 of > the standard name table, so this one is done. > > 2. toa_outgoing_shortwave_flux_assuming_clear_sky_and_no_aerosol > (Wm-2) This is the same as RFMIP proposal 1 (see below), so I will deal with > this one as part of the RFMIP request. > > 3. toa_outgoing_shortwave_flux_assuming_no_aerosol (W m-2) This > proposal is straight forward. We have one existing assuming_no_aerosol name, > volume_attenuated_backwards_scattering_function_in_air_assuming_no_aerosol_or_cloud. > The definition can be constructed from existing text: > 'The abbreviation "toa" means top of atmosphere. The term "shortwave" means > shortwave radiation. The TOA outgoing shortwave flux is the reflected and > scattered solar radiative flux i.e. the "upwelling" TOA shortwave flux, > sometimes called the "outgoing shortwave radiation" or "OSR". In accordance > with common usage in geophysical disciplines, "flux" implies per unit area, > called "flux density" in physics. A phrase "assuming_condition" indicates > that the named quantity is the value which would obtain if all aspects of the > system were unaltered except for the assumption of the circumstances > specified by the condition.' > > This name is accepted for publication in the standard name table and has been > included in this week's update. > > RFMIP > > 1. toa_outgoing_shortwave_flux_assuming_clean_clear_sky (W m-2) > Jonathan commented (in 2016) that it would be preferable to say 'no_aerosol' > rather than 'clean' > (http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2016/059135.html). I have > seen some offlist emails that indicate 'no_aerosol' is now being used in > preference to 'clean' in the CMIP6 long names. Also, this is consistent with > the one existing no_aerosol name and the GeoMIP proposals. > > This one should therefore be as follows: > toa_outgoing_shortwave_flux_assuming_clear_sky_and_no_aerosol (W m-2) > 'The abbreviation "toa" means top of atmosphere. The term "shortwave" means > shortwave radiation. The TOA outgoing shortwave flux is the reflected and > scattered solar radiative flux i.e. the "upwelling" TOA shortwave flux, > sometimes called the "outgoing shortwave radiation" or "OSR". In accordance > with common usage in geophysical disciplines, "flux" implies per unit area, > called "flux density" in physics. A phrase "assuming_condition" indicates > that the named quantity is the value which would obtain if all aspects of the > system were unaltered except for the assumption of the circumstances > specified by the condition. "Clear sky" means in the absence of clouds.' > > This name, units and definition are consistent with existing names so it is > accepted and has been added in this week's standard name table update. > > This proposal has been around for a long time and there is a possibility that > some data have been written with the original version of the name. For this > reason I have added toa_outgoing_shortwave_flux_assuming_clean_clear_sky to > the standard name table and then immediately turned it into an alias of > toa_outgoing_shortwave_flux_assuming_clear_sky_and_no_aerosol. This has been > achieved by updating the standard name table twice - both versions will be > published this week. (The double update is necessary to keep in sync with the > standard name publication process on the NERC Vocabulary Server). We don't > usually publish two versions of a name almost simultaneously, but there is a > precedent for treating long standing proposals in this way - for example it > was done for some standard names arising from trac ticket 37 which took a > couple of years to agree. This arrangement affects 5 names for RFMIP. > > 2. surface_downwelling_shortwave_flux_in_air_assuming_clean_clear_sky > (W m-2) > > As for proposal 1, we should replace 'clean' with 'no_aerosol': > surface_downwelling_shortwave_flux_in_air_assuming_clear_sky_and_no_ae > rosol (W m-2) 'The surface called "surface" means the lower boundary of the > atmosphere. Downwelling radiation is radiation from above. It does not mean > "net downward". The term "shortwave" means shortwave radiation. Surface > downwelling shortwave is the sum of direct and diffuse solar radiation > incident on the surface, and is sometimes called "global radiation". When > thought of as being incident on a surface, a radiative flux is sometimes > called "irradiance". In addition, it is identical with the quantity measured > by a cosine-collector light-meter and sometimes called "vector irradiance". > In accordance with common usage in geophysical disciplines, "flux" implies > per unit area, called "flux density" in physics. A phrase > "assuming_condition" indicates that the named quantity is the value which > would obtain if all aspects of the system were unaltered except for the > assumption of the circumstances specified by the condition. "Clear sky" means > in the absence of clouds.' > > This name, units and definition are consistent with existing names so it is > accepted and will be added in this week's standard name table update. As for > proposal 1, I have published the original version of the name and immediately > turned it into an alias of the final version. > > 3. surface_upwelling_shortwave_flux_in_air_assuming_clean_clear_sky (W > m-2) > > As for proposal 1, we should replace 'clean' with 'no_aerosol': > surface_upwelling_shortwave_flux_in_air_assuming_clear_sky_and_no_aero > sol (W m-2) 'The surface called "surface" means the lower boundary of the > atmosphere. Upwelling radiation is radiation from below. It does not mean > "net upward". The term "shortwave" means shortwave radiation. When thought of > as being incident on a surface, a radiative flux is sometimes called > "irradiance". In addition, it is identical with the quantity measured by a > cosine-collector light-meter and sometimes called "vector irradiance". In > accordance with common usage in geophysical disciplines, "flux" implies per > unit area, called "flux density" in physics. A phrase "assuming_condition" > indicates that the named quantity is the value which would obtain if all > aspects of the system were unaltered except for the assumption of the > circumstances specified by the condition. "Clear sky" means in the absence of > clouds.' > > This name, units and definition are consistent with existing names so it is > accepted and will be added in this week's standard name table update. As for > proposal 1, I have published the original version of the name and immediately > turned it into an alias of the final version. > > 4. upwelling_shortwave_flux_in_air_assuming_clean_clear_sky (W m-2) > > As for proposal 1, we should replace 'clean' with 'no_aerosol': > upwelling_shortwave_flux_in_air_assuming_clear_sky_and_no_aerosol (W > m-2) 'Upwelling radiation is radiation from below. It does not mean "net > upward". The term "shortwave" means shortwave radiation. When thought of as > being incident on a surface, a radiative flux is sometimes called > "irradiance". In addition, it is identical with the quantity measured by a > cosine-collector light-meter and sometimes called "vector irradiance". In > accordance with common usage in geophysical disciplines, "flux" implies per > unit area, called "flux density" in physics. A phrase "assuming_condition" > indicates that the named quantity is the value which would obtain if all > aspects of the system were unaltered except for the assumption of the > circumstances specified by the condition. "Clear sky" means in the absence of > clouds.' > > This name, units and definition are consistent with existing names so it is > accepted and will be added in this week's standard name table update. As for > proposal 1, I have published the original version of the name and immediately > turned it into an alias of the final version. > > 5. downwelling_shortwave_flux_in_air_assuming_clean_clear_sky (W m-2) > > As for proposal 1, we should replace 'clean' with 'no_aerosol': > downwelling_shortwave_flux_in_air_assuming_clear_sky_and_no_aerosol (W > m-2) 'Downwelling radiation is radiation from above. It does not mean "net > downward". The term "shortwave" means shortwave radiation. When thought of as > being incident on a surface, a radiative flux is sometimes called > "irradiance". In addition, it is identical with the quantity measured by a > cosine-collector light-meter and sometimes called "vector irradiance". In > accordance with common usage in geophysical disciplines, "flux" implies per > unit area, called "flux density" in physics. A phrase "assuming_condition" > indicates that the named quantity is the value which would obtain if all > aspects of the system were unaltered except for the assumption of the > circumstances specified by the condition. "Clear sky" means in the absence of > clouds.' > > This name, units and definition are consistent with existing names so it is > accepted and will be added in this week's standard name table update. As for > proposal 1, I have published the original version of the name and immediately > turned it into an alias of the final version. > > Now I am coming to some even older proposals for RFMIP, dating from 2015. > They received only one comment at the time and I think the names, units and > definitions need some work. For two of the quantities I think we can probably > use existing names. I hope Martin, Daniel and Robert will be able to advise > on these proposals. > > 6. CMIP6 short name albdiff. > surface_spectral_hemispherical_reflectance_of_diffuse_shortwave_radiat > ion (1) I think we probably shouldn't say 'spectral' in the name. We used to > have standard names that included 'spectral' but then we agreed to change > them all to say 'per_unit_wavelength' or 'per_unit_wavenumber'. > Per_unit_wavelength introduces a unit of m-1 and per_unit_wavenumber > introduces a unit of (m-1)-1; I suspect neither is appropriate in this case. > We can still add a sentence in the definition that would say something like > 'The reflectance is assumed to be an integral over all wavelengths, unless a > coordinate of radiation_wavelength or radiation_frequency is included to > specify either the wavelength or frequency' to allow the quantity to be > specified at different wavelengths or frequencies. We do this for quite a > number of existing names. > > We have an existing name downwelling_spherical_irradiance_in_sea_water > defined as 'Downwelling radiation is radiation from above. It does not mean > "net downward". Spherical irradiance is the radiation incident on unit area > of a hemispherical (or "2-pi") collector. It is sometimes called "scalar > irradiance". The direction (up/downwelling) is specified. Radiation incident > on a 4-pi collector has standard names of "omnidirectional spherical > irradiance".' This makes me think that we should refer to the proposed name > as a 'spherical' rather than 'hemishpherical' reflectance - presumably it is > the reflectance that would apply to any shortwave radiation arriving at the > surface from any upward direction. Apart from the omnidirectional names, all > the existing 'spherical' names include some sense of direction (upwelling or > downwelling). Since the current proposal is for shortwave radiation incident > at the surface, I suggest we need to say 'downwelling'. > > We do have existing names for diffuse radiation, e.g. > surface_diffuse_downwelling_shortwave_flux_in_air. We can just say > 'shortwave' instead of 'shortwave radiation' because that would be explained > in the definition. > > Putting all this together, I think we would arrive at the following name, > units and definition: > surface_diffuse_downwelling_shortwave_spherical_reflectance (1) 'The > surface called "surface" means the lower boundary of the atmosphere. > "Diffuse" radiation is radiation that has been scattered by particles in the > atmosphere such as cloud droplets and aerosols. Downwelling radiation is > radiation from above. It does not mean "net downward". The term "shortwave" > means shortwave radiation. Spherical reflectance is the reflectance of > radiation incident on unit area of a hemispherical (or "2-pi") collector. > Reflectance is the ratio of the energy of the reflected to the incident > radiation. A coordinate variable of radiation_wavelength or > radiation_frequency can be used to specify the wavelength or frequency, > respectively, of the radiation.' > > What do others think? > > 7. CMIP6 short name albdir. > surface_spectral_hemispherical_reflectance_of_direct_shortwave_radiati > on (1) > > We have one existing name for direct radiation, > direct_downwelling_shortwave_flux_in_air. > > Following similar arguments to proposal 6, I suggest this one should be: > surface_direct_downwelling_shortwave_spherical_reflectance (1) 'The > surface called "surface" means the lower boundary of the atmosphere. "Direct" > (also known as "beam") radiation is radiation that has followed a direct path > from the sun and is alternatively known as "direct insolation". Downwelling > radiation is radiation from above. It does not mean "net downward". The term > "shortwave" means shortwave radiation. Spherical reflectance is the > reflectance of radiation incident on unit area of a hemispherical (or "2-pi") > collector. Reflectance is the ratio of the energy of the reflected to the > incident radiation. A coordinate variable of radiation_wavelength or > radiation_frequency can be used to specify the wavelength or frequency, > respectively, of the radiation.' > > Do others agree? > > 8. CMIP6 short name sol. > toa_incoming_shortwave_flux_per_unit_wavelength (W m-2) If this is > intended to be a truly spectrally resolved quantity, then the name is > correct, but as I mentioned for proposal 6 the units should be W m-2 m-1. We > do have an existing name toa_incoming_shortwave_flux which is integrated > across all shortwave frequencies. > > If we leave the name as it is, then we would have: > toa_incoming_shortwave_flux_per_unit_wavelength (W m-2 m-1) 'The > abbreviation "toa" means top of atmosphere. The term "shortwave" means > shortwave radiation. The TOA incoming shortwave flux is the radiative flux > from the sun i.e. the "downwelling" TOA shortwave flux. In accordance with > common usage in geophysical disciplines, "flux" implies per unit area, called > "flux density" in physics. A coordinate variable for radiation wavelength > should be given the standard name radiation_wavelength.' > > If these units are not acceptable we could use the existing name > toa_incoming_shortwave_flux (W m-2) 'The abbreviation "toa" means top > of atmosphere. The term "shortwave" means shortwave radiation. The TOA > incoming shortwave flux is the radiative flux from the sun i.e. the > "downwelling" TOA shortwave flux. In accordance with common usage in > geophysical disciplines, "flux" implies per unit area, called "flux density" > in physics.' > > The definition is the same except for the sentence about the coordinate > variable. We could add a slightly softer version of that sentence, similar to > the reflectance names, 'A coordinate variable of radiation_wavelength or > radiation_frequency can be used to specify the wavelength or frequency, > respectively, of the radiation.' This would allow wavelength to be used as a > dimension, but wouldn't alter the units. > > What do others think? > > 9. CMIP6 short name aerext. > volume_spectral_extinction_coefficient_in_air_due_to_ambient_aerosol_p > articles (1) > > As with the reflectance proposals, we shouldn't say 'spectral' in the name > and if we say 'per_unit_wavelength' it would alter the units. In fact, for > this quantity I think we have an existing name that would do the job: > volume_extinction_coefficient_in_air_due_to_ambient_aerosol_particles > (1) 'The volume extinction coefficient is the fractional change of radiative > flux per unit path length. Extinction is the sum of absorption and > scattering, sometimes called "attenuation". "Extinction" is the term most > commonly used at optical wavelengths whereas "attenuation" is more often used > at radio and radar wavelengths. "Aerosol" means the system of suspended > liquid or solid particles in air (except cloud droplets) and their carrier > gas, the air itself. "Ambient_aerosol" means that the aerosol is measured or > modelled at the ambient state of pressure, temperature and relative humidity > that exists in its immediate environment. "Ambient aerosol particles" are > aerosol particles that have taken up ambient water through hygroscopic > growth. The extent of hygroscopic growth depends on the relative humidity and > the composition of the particles. The specification of a physical process by > the phrase "due_to_" process means that the quantity named is a single term > in a sum of terms which together compose the general quantity named by omitting the phrase.' > > Again, we could add an advisory sentence to the definition to say that a > coordinate variable of radiation_wavelength can be specified. What do others > think? > > 10. CMIP6 short name aerssa. > volume_spectral_single_scattering_albedo_in_air_due_to_ambient_aerosol > _particles (1) > > This one is similar to proposal 9. Again we shouldn't say 'spectral' and > there is the question of units. I think this is another one for which we have > an existing name: > single_scattering_albedo_in_air_due_to_ambient_aerosol_particles (1) > '"Single scattering albedo" is the fraction of radiation in an incident light > beam scattered by the particles of an aerosol reference volume for a given > wavelength. It is the ratio of the scattering and the extinction coefficients > of the aerosol particles in the reference volume. A coordinate variable with > a standard name of radiation_wavelength or radiation_frequency should be > included to specify either the wavelength or frequency. "Aerosol" means the > system of suspended liquid or solid particles in air (except cloud droplets) > and their carrier gas, the air itself. "Ambient_aerosol" means that the > aerosol is measured or modelled at the ambient state of pressure, temperature > and relative humidity that exists in its immediate environment. "Ambient > aerosol particles" are aerosol particles that have taken up ambient water > through hygroscopic growth. The extent of hygroscopic growth depends on the > relative humidity and the composition of the particles. To specify the > relative humidity and temperature at which the quantity described by the standard name applies, provide scalar coordinate variables with standard names of "relative_humidity" and "air_temperature". The specification of a physical process by the phrase "due_to_" process means that the quantity named is a single term in a sum of terms which together compose the general quantity named by omitting the phrase.' > > As with proposal 9, we could add an advisory sentence to the definition to > say that a coordinate variable of radiation_wavelength can be specified. What > do others think? > > 11. CMIP6 short name aerasym. > volume_spectral_asymmetry_factor_in_air_due_to_ambient_aerosol_particl > es (1) > > I am not really familiar with this quantity, but I note Markus Fiebig's > comment (http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2015/058422.html) > when the names were originally proposed to the mailing list: >> For the aerosol asymmetry factor / parameter, I'm familiar with the >> definition as the cosine weighted angular integral of the aerosol >> scattering phase function. For the property you describe, I know the term >> "backscatter fraction", i.e. the ratio of the integral over the scattering >> phase function in the backward hemisphere (backscatter coefficient) over the >> aerosol scattering coefficient. > > It sounds like this one is a new quantity to standard names. Again, I don't > think the name itself should say 'spectral'. Rather than 'factor' I would > suggest the term 'coefficient' which is already used in existing names. Also, > I don't know whether we really need 'volume' in this case - I think this > refers to extinction along the path of the radiation and volume coefficients > have units of m-1. Does the asymmetry factor refer to a single scattering > event or to multiple events along a path? I suggest the name would be: > [volume_]asymmetry_coefficient_of_radiative_flux_in_air_due_to_ambient > _aerosol_particles (1) and the definition would be something like: > 'The asymmetry coefficient is the ratio of forward to backward scattered > radiative flux. The asymmetry coefficient is assumed to be an integral over > all wavelengths, unless a coordinate of radiation_wavelength is included to > specify the wavelength. The specification of a physical process by the phrase > "due_to_" process means that the quantity named is a single term in a sum of > terms which together compose the general quantity named by omitting the > phrase. "Aerosol" means the system of suspended liquid or solid particles in > air (except cloud droplets) and their carrier gas, the air itself. > "Ambient_aerosol" means that the aerosol is measured or modelled at the > ambient state of pressure, temperature and relative humidity that exists in > its immediate environment. "Ambient aerosol particles" are aerosol particles > that have taken up ambient water through hygroscopic growth. The extent of > hygroscopic growth depends on the relative humidity and the composition of > the particles. To specify the relative humidity and temperature at which the quantity described by the standard name applies, provide scalar coordinate variables with standard names of "relative_humidity" and "air_temperature".' > > What do others think? > > Best wishes, > Alison > > ------ > Alison Pamment Tel: +44 1235 778065 > NCAS/Centre for Environmental Data Archival Email: alison.pamment > at > stfc.ac.uk<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata> > STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory > R25, 2.22 > Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K. > > > _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
