Hi.

Sorry I have been so quiet lately. I've been caught up in other activities.

I have a strong aversion to the proposal to overload the missing_value attribute with a wholly different meaning. Using missing_value in this way will produce unexpected results in a number of existing software packages. If the minor modification to CF to designate flag attributes to be used on coordinate variables doesn't seem like an acceptable solution for one reason or another, I think we should define a new convention that doesn't add contradictory interpretations of existing attributes.

Grace and peace,

Jim

On 5/2/19 11:49 AM, Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC wrote:
Dear Jonathan, Jim,



I’m sorry to have dropped this conversation after starting it three years ago. 
We ended up not fixing the problem for CMIP6, but I think it is worth taking 
another look.



Coming back to it again, I think that a variation on Jim’s suggestion could 
work: rather than using flags it should be possible to use a coordinate 
variable, as is done for some CMIP variables that have region names along one 
axis. The NetCDF  dimension would be an index, and the array of values defining 
the bins would be an auxiliary coordinate which, I believe, is not subject to 
the rules on monotonicity and missing values which apply to NetCDF dimensions. 
There may be a need for some clarifications, but I think this approach would be 
much closer to the current convention that any change in the specification for 
non-auxiliary coordinate variables.


We have a specific use case in CMIP6 for which the bins are height bins (height of 
detected cloud), with one bin reserved for "retrieval error".


This might not need a change in the convention rules, but it would help, I 
think, to at least add an example and a standard name for the coordinate 
variable. For example:


float data(time,lat,lon,zindex);

   data: standard_name =   
"histogram_of_equivalent_reflectivity_factor_over_height_above_reference_ellipsoid";

   data: coordinates="zbins";

float zbins(zindex);

   zbins: long_name="Height ranges (with bin for missing data at first 
element)";

   zbins:missing_value= -9999.;

   zbins: units="m";

   zbins: bounds="zbin_bnds";

   zbins: standard_name = "????";

float zbin_bnds(zindex,2);

   zbin_bnds:missing_value= -9999.;

float lat(lat);

float lon(lon);


data:

   zbins = -9999., 25., 100., ....;

   zbin_bnds = -9999.,-9999., 0., 50., 50., 150., ...


The use of missing_value in the bounds variable appears to conflict with 
conformance rules, but I'm not sure if this is really banned by the convention 
in this context.


Using missing_value in this way appears to be acceptable to the convention, but I think 
it conflicts with the spirit of the convention: it is not indicating that a value of 
"zbins" is missing, but indicating that this index of the array relates to a 
count of missing values. For this reason I have omitted _FillValue.


The "zbins" auxiliary coordinate here is a height-like variable, but I don't think we can use a standard name 
"height": is it worth adding a standard name "height_bins" defined to be "Height ranges, as 
used, for example in a histogram or frequency distribution. A variable with this standard name may include a special 
bin for the count or frequency of missing data. This should be indicated by setting the value of that bin and its 
bounds to equal the missing_value of the variable. If there is no missing value bin, it is recommended that the term 
'height' be used instead."


regards,

Martin


CF-metadata] Missing data bins in histograms

Jonathan Gregoryj.m.gregory at reading.ac.uk 
<mailto:cf-metadata%40cgd.ucar.edu?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BCF-metadata%5D%20Missing%20data%20bins%20in%20histograms&In-Reply-To=%3C20161013094247.GF6219%40met.reading.ac.uk%3E>
Thu Oct 13 03:42:47 MDT 2016

   *   Previous message (by thread): [CF-metadata] Missing data bins in histograms 
<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2016/018983.html>
   *   Next message (by thread): [CF-metadata] Usage of histogram_of_X_over_Z 
<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2016/008836.html>
   *   Messages sorted by: [ date 
]<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2016/date.html#18984> [ thread 
]<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2016/thread.html#18984> [ subject 
]<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2016/subject.html#18984> [ author 
]<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2016/author.html#18984>

________________________________

Dear Jim



In Appendix A it does not say that the flag attributes are allowed for

coordinate variables - it has just "D" in the "Use" column. This is not an

argument why they shouldn't be if there is a need, but they weren't introduced

with that in mind. The use which you suggested for Martin's case is a good

idea, but I think it would need a change to the convention.



Best wishes



Jonathan



----- Forwarded message from Jim Biard <jbiard at 
cicsnc.org<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata>> -----



Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 14:58:11 -0400
From: Jim Biard <jbiard at 
cicsnc.org<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata>>
To: cf-metadata at 
cgd.ucar.edu<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata>
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Missing data bins in histograms
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0)
      Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
Jonathan,
Missing/fill values are not allowed, but I don't see any language
prohibiting flags. I'd appreciate it if you could expand on your
thoughts about why they aren't allowed.
Grace and peace,
Jim
On 10/12/16 1:30 PM, Jonathan Gregory wrote:
Dear Jim
That is an ingenious idea. I don't think the flag atts are currently allowed
for coord variables, but they could be, I agree.
Best wishes
Jonathan
----- Forwarded message from Jim Biard <jbiard at 
cicsnc.org<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata>> -----
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 14:39:56 -0400
From: Jim Biard <jbiard at 
cicsnc.org<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata>>
To: cf-metadata at 
cgd.ucar.edu<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata>
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Missing data bins in histograms
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0)
   Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
Hi.
Another approach could be to use flag_values and flag_meanings on
the coordinate variable to indicate one or more special coordinate
values that correspond to any number of "missing data" or "out of
bounds" bins. These attributes aren't forbidden by CF, and
everything should be fine as long as the coordinate variable remains
monotonic.
Grace and peace,
Jim
On 10/11/16 8:41 AM, martin.juckes at 
stfc.ac.uk<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata> wrote:
Hello,
the CF standard name list has two "histogram_.... " entries, and in the CMIP6 data 
request we may need to add a third, a histogram_of_cloud_top_height. Besides the standard name, we 
also need, for this new variable, a method of encoding the "missing data" bin in the 
histogram. That is, the histogram should record frequency in 16 data bins and one additional bin 
for the frequency of missing data.
Can we define a "missing_data_index" attribute for histogram variables, and use 
this to indicate that the first bin in the array has this special purpose. It might be 
more pythonic to put the _FillValue in the coordinate value for the missing data bin, but 
I suspect that this would cause substantial problems for many software packages.
regards,
Martin
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata at 
cgd.ucar.edu<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata>
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
CICS-NC <http://www.cicsnc.org/> Visit us on
Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/cicsnc>        *Jim Biard*
*Research Scholar*
Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites NC <http://cicsnc.org/>
North Carolina State University <http://ncsu.edu/>
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information <http://ncdc.noaa.gov/>
/formerly NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center/
151 Patton Ave, Asheville, NC 28801
e: jbiard at cicsnc.org<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata> 
<mailto:jbiard at 
cicsnc.org<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata>>
o: +1 828 271 4900
/Connect with us on Facebook for climate
<https://www.facebook.com/NOAANCEIclimate> and ocean and geophysics
<https://www.facebook.com/NOAANCEIoceangeo> information, and follow
us on Twitter at @NOAANCEIclimate
<https://twitter.com/NOAANCEIclimate> and @NOAANCEIocngeo
<https://twitter.com/NOAANCEIocngeo>. /
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata at 
cgd.ucar.edu<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata>
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
----- End forwarded message -----
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata at 
cgd.ucar.edu<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata>
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
CICS-NC <http://www.cicsnc.org/> Visit us on
Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/cicsnc>  *Jim Biard*
*Research Scholar*
Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites NC <http://cicsnc.org/>
North Carolina State University <http://ncsu.edu/>
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information <http://ncdc.noaa.gov/>
/formerly NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center/
151 Patton Ave, Asheville, NC 28801
e: jbiard at cicsnc.org<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata> 
<mailto:jbiard at 
cicsnc.org<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata>>
o: +1 828 271 4900
/Connect with us on Facebook for climate
<https://www.facebook.com/NOAANCEIclimate> and ocean and geophysics
<https://www.facebook.com/NOAANCEIoceangeo> information, and follow
us on Twitter at @NOAANCEIclimate
<https://twitter.com/NOAANCEIclimate> and @NOAANCEIocngeo
<https://twitter.com/NOAANCEIocngeo>. /


_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata at 
cgd.ucar.edu<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata>
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata




----- End forwarded message -----



________________________________

   *   Previous message (by thread): [CF-metadata] Missing data bins in histograms 
<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2016/018983.html>
   *   Next message (by thread): [CF-metadata] Usage of histogram_of_X_over_Z 
<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2016/008836.html>
   *   Messages sorted by: [ date 
]<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2016/date.html#18984> [ thread 
]<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2016/thread.html#18984> [ subject 
]<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2016/subject.html#18984> [ author 
]<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2016/author.html#18984>

________________________________

More information about the CF-metadata mailing 
list<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata>
--
CICS-NC <http://www.cicsnc.org/> Visit us on
Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/cicsnc>         *Jim Biard*
*Research Scholar*
Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites NC <http://cicsnc.org/>
North Carolina State University <http://ncsu.edu/>
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information <http://ncdc.noaa.gov/>
/formerly NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center/
151 Patton Ave, Asheville, NC 28801
e: jbi...@cicsnc.org <mailto:jbi...@cicsnc.org>
o: +1 828 271 4900

/Connect with us on Facebook for climate <https://www.facebook.com/NOAANCEIclimate> and ocean and geophysics <https://www.facebook.com/NOAANCEIoceangeo> information, and follow us on Twitter at @NOAANCEIclimate <https://twitter.com/NOAANCEIclimate> and @NOAANCEIocngeo <https://twitter.com/NOAANCEIocngeo>. /


_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to