Dear Jonathan and Martin, Thank you both for your comments.
I think the product names are now agreed. I withheld them from the May update due to the continuation of the discussion but will now mark them as accepted and add them in the June update: * product_of_eastward_wind_and_lagrangian_tendency_of_air_pressure * product_of_northward_wind_and_lagrangian_tendency_of_air_pressure * product_of_lagrangian_tendency_of_air_pressure_and_specific_humidity * product_of_lagrangian_tendency_of_air_pressure_and_air_temperature * product_of_lagrangian_tendency_of_air_pressure_and_geopotential_height. I think we are now agreed on covariance_over_longitude_of_northward_wind_and_air_temperature (Canonical units: K m s-1). I agree with Martin's suggestion to include 'Covariance refers to the sample covariance rather than the population covariance' in the definition. Putting this together with other comments in the discussion, plus our usual text for some of the terms, I suggest the following: 'Covariance refers to the sample covariance rather than the population covariance. The quantity with standard name covariance_over_longitude_of_northward_wind_and_air_temperature is the covariance of the deviations of meridional air velocity and air temperature about their respective zonal mean values. The data variable must be accompanied by a vertical coordinate variable or scalar coordinate variable and is calculated on an isosurface of that vertical coordinate. "Northward" indicates a vector component which is positive when directed northward (negative southward). Wind is defined as a two-dimensional (horizontal) air velocity vector, with no vertical component. (Vertical motion in the atmosphere has the standard name "upward_air_velocity"). Air temperature is the bulk temperature of the air, not the surface (skin) temperature.' Is that okay? Best wishes, Alison ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alison Pamment Tel: +44 1235 778065 NCAS/Centre for Environmental Data Analysis Email: alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory R25, 2.22 Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K. -----Original Message----- From: CF-metadata <cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu> On Behalf Of Jonathan Gregory Sent: 30 May 2019 22:49 To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] order of product in standard name Dear Alison I agree with all this and support Martin's suggestions that you have enacted. I agree that omega is like w and it's normal to write wT. Best wishes and thanks Jonathan ----- Forwarded message from Alison Pamment - UKRI STFC <alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk> ----- > Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 13:12:10 +0000 > From: Alison Pamment - UKRI STFC <alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk> > To: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu" <cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu> > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] order of product in standard name > > Dear Jonathan and Martin, > > I would like to make sure that we have fully resolved this issue as it > affects names that are currently under discussion in two threads: > covariance_over_longitude_of_northward_wind_and_air_temperature (latest > comment: http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2019/020922.html); > also: > * product_of_eastward_wind_and_lagrangian_tendency_of_air_pressure > * product_of_northward_wind_and_lagrangian_tendency_of_air_pressure > * product_of_lagrangian_tendency_of_air_pressure_and_specific_humidity > * product_of_lagrangian_tendency_of_air_pressure_and_air_temperature > * product_of_lagrangian_tendency_of_air_pressure_and_geopotential_height > (latest comment > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2019/020927.html). > > I agree with Jonathan that for covariance and correlation names it is better > to have covariance_over_Z_of_X_and_Y, (rather than putting over_Z at the end > as stated in the current guidelines). This is consistent with the way we now > write integrals as integral_wrt_X_of_Y. > > The current guidelines for correlation and covariance say simply that X and Y > should be ordered alphabetically, whereas for product we have additional > guidance: 'If X and Y are both scalars or both components of vectors, they > are put in alphabetical order. If one of them is the component of a vector, > it is put first i.e. the vector component is X, the scalar is Y.' > > I think we are agreed that the same guidelines should apply to the ordering > of X and Y in standard names for all commutative properties such as product, > covariance, correlation, etc. > > The rule about putting vector components first means that the covariance name > as written above is in the correct order. > > Regarding the lagrangian tendency names, I agree with Martin's argument that > lagrangian_tendency_of_air_pressure should be regarded as a vertical > component of the air velocity vector, rather than a scalar. Therefore it is > correct to write the specific_humidity, air_temperature and > geopotential_height names as above (this is the opposite way round to what > was originally proposed). > > I also agree with Martin's suggestion of ordering vector components as > X=horizontal and Y=vertical when horizontal and vertical components are the > operands. This is a useful general convention and gets around the problem of > having product_of_eastward_wind_and_lagrangian_tendency_of_air_pressure and > product_of_lagrangian_tendency_of_air_pressure_and_northward_wind which would > arise from the alphabetical rule. (Of course if we are combining two > horizontal or two vertical vector components we would still need to fall back > on the alphabetical rule). > > It is on my 'To Do' list in the next couple of months to conduct a thorough > review of the standard names Guidelines document and the sections of the > Conventions document covering standard names and units. They are all somewhat > out of date. If we can agree these changes they can be included as part of > that process. > > Best wishes, > Alison > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Alison Pamment Tel: > +44 1235 778065 > NCAS/Centre for Environmental Data Analysis Email: > alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk > STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory > R25, 2.22 > Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: CF-metadata <cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu> On Behalf Of Jonathan > Gregory > Sent: 10 May 2019 15:08 > To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu > Subject: [CF-metadata] order of product in standard name > > Dear all > > I should have noticed that we already have a guideline about > product_of_X_and_Y, which should also apply to covariance, correlation, and > any other commutative function of X and Y: > > If X and Y are both scalars or both components of vectors, they are put in > alphabetical order. If one of them is the component of a vector, it is put > first i.e. the vector component is X, the scalar is Y. > > Cheers > > Jonathan > _______________________________________________ > CF-metadata mailing list > CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata > > _______________________________________________ > CF-metadata mailing list > CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata ----- End forwarded message ----- _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
