This message came from the CF Trac system.  Do not reply.  Instead, enter your 
comments in the CF Trac system at https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/.

#96: Julian/Gregorian calendar name and constraints
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  Dave.Allured    |       Owner:  cf-conventi...@lists.llnl.gov      
   
      Type:  enhancement     |      Status:  new                                
   
  Priority:  medium          |   Milestone:                                     
   
 Component:  cf-conventions  |     Version:                                     
   
Resolution:                  |    Keywords:  calendar time julian gregorian 
udunits
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment (by jonathan):

 Dear Dave

 Thanks for the clarification. At the start of the ticket you describe the
 new calendar name as a synonym and an alternative name. I understand now
 that the proposal is actually for a new calendar, not a synonym for an
 existing calendar.

 It would be fine to have a more informative and correct name for the
 default calendar. However I wonder what would be achieved by introducing a
 new, more restrictive, version of that calendar. We would like to disallow
 use of years before year 1 (except for the COARDS climatological time
 convention, which we could deprecate), and we would like recommend against
 using a reference date which is before (or within) the transitional period
 if the time coordinates are all after the transitional period, because
 both of these are problematic with the udunits calendar. But a person who
 is aware that these give problems would not use them with the default
 calendar, I guess, and therefore does not need a new calendar to
 prevent/deprecate their use. On the other hand, a person who is unaware of
 the problems will also be unaware of the new restrictive calendar, and so
 will not use it. Hence I am not convinced this would really help in the
 end. Have I missed the point?

 It seems to me that to prevent the problems we actually need to change the
 default calendar, as previously discussed. I think it would be tolerable
 to do that so long as the new default has the same interpretation as the
 old default for any time units and coordinates that remain legal i.e. the
 effect of the changed definition is only to make some things illegal or
 deprecated.

 Best wishes

 Jonathan

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/96#comment:5>
CF Metadata <http://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/>
CF Metadata

This message came from the CF Trac system.  To unsubscribe, without 
unsubscribing to the regular cf-metadata list, send a message to 
"majord...@lists.llnl.gov" with "unsubscribe cf-metadata" in the body of your 
message.

Reply via email to