This message came from the CF Trac system. Do not reply. Instead, enter your comments in the CF Trac system at https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/.
#74: Allow sharing of ancillary variables among multiple data variables ---------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: [email protected] | Owner: [email protected] Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: medium | Milestone: Component: cf-conventions | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: "ancillary data" "standard name modifiers" ---------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by biard): I'm afraid that I am confused by the change Russ has suggested. The second form is specifically intended for allowing the ancillary variable to explicitly express a "multiple parentage" relationship. Is there any reason why it would be acceptable to have an ancillary variable name multiple standard names if it is only referenced by a single primary? -- Ticket URL: <https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/74#comment:15> CF Metadata <http://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/> CF Metadata This message came from the CF Trac system. To unsubscribe, without unsubscribing to the regular cf-metadata list, send a message to "[email protected]" with "unsubscribe cf-metadata" in the body of your message.
