This message came from the CF Trac system. Do not reply. Instead, enter your comments in the CF Trac system at https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/.
#107: CF Data Model 1.7 -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Reporter: markh | Owner: [email protected] Type: task | Status: new Priority: medium | Milestone: Component: cf-conventions | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Comment (by markh): My reading of these comments suggests that it is a good idea to separate the concepts of `coordinate reference system` and `derived coordinate` within the model. Does this concur with other people's feelings on the matter? If so, I think we can handle the fine detail of what it means to define a particular CRS instance outside of the scope of this ticket. We can simply state that: A coordinate may reference one coordinate reference system, the coordinate is then defined with respect to this CRS. Derived coordinates are just examples of coordinates, which can all be defined with respect to a CRS as required. is this a useful interpretation? mark -- Ticket URL: <https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/107#comment:51> CF Metadata <http://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/> CF Metadata This message came from the CF Trac system. To unsubscribe, without unsubscribing to the regular cf-metadata list, send a message to "[email protected]" with "unsubscribe cf-metadata" in the body of your message.
