This message came from the CF Trac system.  Do not reply.  Instead, enter your 
comments in the CF Trac system at http://kitt.llnl.gov/trac/.

#107: CF Data Model 1.7
-----------------------------+------------------------------
  Reporter:  markh           |      Owner:  cf-conventions@…
      Type:  task            |     Status:  new
  Priority:  medium          |  Milestone:
 Component:  cf-conventions  |    Version:
Resolution:                  |   Keywords:
-----------------------------+------------------------------
\
\
\
\
\
\

Comment (by biard):

 Replying to [comment:60 davidhassell]:
 > Replying to [comment:59 markh]:
 >
 > Dear Mark, Jim,
 >
 > > Replying to [comment:56 biard]:
 > >
 > > > I get the feeling that your effort to put formula_terms and
 grid_mapping together in one construct definition may be what's making
 things awkward.
 > >
 > > I agree with you Jim, I think this is awkward.
 >
 > > The functionality of CF-NetCDF formula_terms and grid_mappings may be
 simpler and clearer in the model if they are defined separately; they are
 quite different.
 >
 > Ok. We should discuss this! I think that fundamentally they are the
 same, which why they should not be separated in the ''logical'' data model
 > ...
 > All the best,
 >
 > David
 As I read the definition and usage of formula_terms, I find that it is
 '''entirely and only''' a description of how to combine the values of a
 unitless coordinate variable with values from other variables to produce
 coordinate values that have units.  It is possible that this "resultant
 coordinate" could be georeferenced, but that is something else.  It is
 true that it is meaningless to associate a CRS with a unitless coordinate
 variable if you don't provide a description of how to get to values that
 can be georeferenced, but this doesn't mean that a mathematical transform
 equates on any level with a declaration of a CRS.

 Grace and peace,

 Jim
\
\
\

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://kitt.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/107#comment:62>
CF Metadata <http://kitt.llnl.gov/>
CF Metadata
This message came from the CF Trac system.  To unsubscribe, without 
unsubscribing to the regular cf-metadata list, send a message to 
"[email protected]" with "unsubscribe cf-metadata" in the body of your 
message.

Reply via email to