We've decided not to use ClusterCats in favor of using the F5 alone.
We monitor our services on a separate server using IPSentry.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 11:29 AM
To: CF-Server
Subject: RE: ClusterCats and F5 BigIP
Since it was already packaged with enterprise, we wanted to use it to notify
us via email when CFServer service failed or if a thread was held open, etc.
BIGIP can be configured to alert based on events written to the log, but I
figured ClusterCats could monitor the CF Services and threads better.
Is there anyone out there running CC behind a HLB? or is everyone running
only CC or only HLB?
-----Original Message-----
From: Brook Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 1:07 PM
To: CF-Server
Subject: Re: ClusterCats and F5 BigIP
Why do you need clustercats with the F5 BigIP?
At 12:47 PM 02/01/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Does anyone have experience running ClusterCats in passive mode behind the
>BigIP LB?
>
>I've followed the Allaire tech article (15972) for using clustercats in
>conjunction
>with a non Cisco LocalDirector LB...but am getting some poor performance
>results. When clustercats is turned off, the pages are served up very
>quickly. However as soon as the clustercats services are turned on, the
>pages are served up very slowly. Are there any additional settings I am
>missing? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
'unsubscribe' in the body or visit the list page at www.houseoffusion.com
