The brief says nothing of the sort, and you really can't compare the
performance of a dual 933Mhz P3 system with a dual 500 Mhz processors,
Xeon's or not.

-- 
 Jon
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Wednesday, July 24, 2002, 5:58:05 PM, you wrote:
ML> Congratulations to Jessie Noller et all for making Linux the highest
ML> performing platform available for ColdFusion.

ML> Matt Liotta
ML> President & CEO
ML> Montara Software, Inc.
ML> http://www.montarasoftware.com/
ML> V: 415-577-8070
ML> F: 415-341-8906
ML> P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Phil Costa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 2:47 PM
>> To: CF-Talk
>> Subject: ColdFusion MX performance brief now available
>> 
>> A lot of you have asked for this information, and now it's available.
>> 
>> http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/whitepapers/
>> 
>> In production, CFMX is as fast or faster than CF5 and CF4.5.
>> 
>> Philip Costa
>> Sr. Product Manager
>> Macromedia
>> 
ML> 
______________________________________________________________________
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to