Well, I am glad to hear that it IS working. I am simply referencing a file at the webroot. I have a feeling that CF might think the webroot is the standalone webroot. Maybe thats the problem.
Does anyone know where the webroot is set? Brook At 03:00 PM 26/07/02 -0500, you wrote: >I had a problem with ours that I resolved. I will tell you how it is >arranged and what I did. You can decide it is similar to your problem. > >We had an absolute path in cf5 that went to another drive letter and path >for our file. In MX it uses relative paths only. It also has to be inside >of the webroot directory. Ours was not. > >To solve this I created an physical directory in the webroot with the same >name as the folder where my file existed. I then created a "dummy" file >with the same name as the one I wanted to use and inside this "dummy" file I >placed a <CFINCLUDE> of the actual file. Because it was relative, inside >the webroot and could run cf code, it worked just fine. I had tried using >virtual directories and spent several days trying to get it to work being as >creative as I could. This was the only way I could actually get it to run. >I could have just placed the actual files there, I know, but I keep my files >elsewhere and wanted to keep it that way. This approach allows me to do >that. > >Good Luck. > >Mike > >-----Original Message----- >From: Brook Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 1:16 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: Re: site wide missing template handler not working in MX > > >Yeah, I tried that. Has anyone got this working? Can someone running CFMX >confirm that this is a bug please? Or just me.. > >At 02:44 PM 26/07/02 -0300, you wrote: > >AFAIK, this path in MX is now relative to the web root directory. Did you > >try this? > > > >Regards, > >Marcello Frutig. > >-- Astrolábio > > > > >Has ANYBODY been able to get the site wide error handler templates to >work > > >in CFMX? Everytime I try to add one in the admin it tells me the path is > > >wrong. I've tried every combination of path variations under the sun. >I've > > >also seen a thread in the mm forums where other people are having the >same > > >problem with no answer yet. > > > > > > > > > > > >At 11:29 AM 26/07/02 -0300, you wrote: > > >>Jesse and folks, we don't experience the same when dealing with > > >>ASP/PHP/Perl and even JSP (afaik). Ok, this natural on any programming > > >>language such as pure Java, C++ and so on, but I don't agree that such > > >>behaviour is natural and expected in server-side scripts/languages such > > >>as CF and ASP. Maybe MM could go forward on this and provide something > > >>to perform the compilation faster or/and do it on the time we save a > > >>cfm template. > > >> > > >>I have a friend that says the following about CFMX: it seens that CFMX > > >>takes a long turn (gets more time and server resources) to get back to > > >>the same place we can start (or just walk a little bit) with JPS. I > > >>think this is a crap (CFML is easy, rapid and lovely) but the point is: > > >>are the price for the "Java World" too high for merely mortals that just > > >>want to do little things with CF (which is the perfect server-side > > >>architeture for that)? > > >> > > >>Abraços! > > >>Alex. > > >> > > >> > > >>-----Original Message----- > > >>From: Jesse Noller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >>Sent: 26/07/2002 9:44 AM > > >>To: CF-Talk > > >>Subject: RE: It's official: CFMX is 10% faster than CF5 > > >> > > >> > > >>/takes off tinfoil hat > > >> > > >>Uh, just to throw this in, compilation of code is something you deal > > >>with almost any programming language. C, C++, Java, etc. It's a bit of a > > >>movement of a literal line by line read, but overall, it does increase > > >>the speed of the end result. > > >> > > >>Saying "that's Java" is incorrect. "That's Programming" would be more > > >>apt. > > >> > > >>Jesse Noller > > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>Macromedia Server Development > > >>Unix/Linux "special guy" > > >> > > >> > -----Original Message----- > > >> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >> > Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 8:39 AM > > >> > To: CF-Talk > > >> > Subject: Re: It's official: CFMX is 10% faster than CF5 > > >> > > > >> > Yea it is a pain in the ass to have it compile the first time but > > >> > thats java for you what do you expect ;) > > >> > > > >> > See java has its bad points. :P > > >> > > > >> > Bill Wheatley > > >> > Senior Database Developer > > >> > Macromedia Certified Advanced Coldfusion Developer > > >> > EDIETS.COM > > >> > 954.360.9022 X159 > > >> > ICQ 417645 > > >> > ----- Original Message ----- > > >> > From: "Alex Hubner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> > Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 4:31 PM > > >> > Subject: It's official: CFMX is 10% faster than CF5 > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > CFMX Performance Brief: CFMX is "only" 10% faster than CF5 under > > >> > > Win2k > > >> > > boxes: > > >> > > > > >>http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/whitepapers/pdf/cfmx_perfo > > >> > > rmance_brief.pdf > > >> > > > > >> > > Well, almost everybody knows it in it's day-by-day tests/usages... > > >> > > > > >> > > I disagree with the tests. CFMX is not 10% faster than CF5... It > > >> > > looks that MM doesn't take in consideration the time (very long, > > >> > > specially on templates that calls lots of includes, such as fusebox > > >> > > ones), to the just-in-time compiler finish it's job (which takes > > >> > > 100% of my CPU)... I've told once and I'm gonna say it again: it's >a > > >> > > >> > > pain in the ass wait CFMX compiles my templates everytime I modify > > >> > > it. In a production environment this is acceptable but in a > > >> > > development environment is realy bad! It becames painless if you >use > > >> > > >> > > 1Gb processors or faster but... Well, does anybody has the same > > >> > > complain? > > >> > > > > >> > > []'s > > >> > > Alex > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
