Yes, exactly, I am working the full fledged shipping route with UPS on a CF 5 server. The test file you mentioned would be so appreciated you have no idea.
Regards, Eric J Hoffman DataStream Connexion www.datastreamconnexion.com Delivering Creative Data Solutions -----Original Message----- From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2002 9:37 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: XML Error You wouldn't by any chance be using cfhttp to POST your XML to UPS using CF5 or MX would you? If so, half your problem is to blame on a Macromedia programmer who didn't have his head screwed on right when he decided to urlencode all cfhttp posts, and then blame the other programmer who didn't have his (could be a her...dunno <g/>) head on straight either when he decided it wasn't important when raised during the MX betas. I would suggest yelling and screaming at them...don't know if it will do any good though. They have ignored the problem forever. They do however love to tout the fact that UPS is using CF on their intranet in their press releases. Ironic no? The other half is that UPS requires text/xml as the Content-Type IIRC, another thing cfhttp can't do. Not that it will make you feel any better, but change the post url to a page that looks something like this to verify exactly what is getting sent across the wire. <cfsavecontent var="dump"> <cfdump var="#form#"> </cfsavecontent> and write the the contents of the dump var to a file. You will see some lovely mangled xml courtesy of cfhttp. On a brighter note, if you wish, I can send you some example code using MSXML that I used to do UPS tracking from CF if you are using CF5. Of course MX hosed MSXML compatibility...so I don't know if that's such a good idea for forward compatibility reasons. Sometimes I think it would be easier to write a CF program to automatically print XML, and send it through the mail... -- jon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Saturday, August 3, 2002, 4:59:33 PM, you wrote: EH> "The XML document is well formed but the document is not valid" EH> Response I get back from the UPS server...can someone place the EH> distinction for me? What am I missing if it is well formed? Cruel EH> jokes...just when you think its all done right.... EH> haha EH> Regards, ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
