Hola Lee,
I've been installing and re-installing CFMX since the early betas on
different platforms in all kinds of different configurations, standard and
not so standard. As for the ease of the process I'd say it's a little
trickier than a CF5 install but overall not very difficult just a few more
details to take note of. I think the product itself is great, especially for
a 1.0
My original post though was concerning the experience of a
particular persona in evaluating the concert of MM's product line....namely
CFMX, Flash and Flash Com. Over the past couple weeks I've lent a helping
hand to a few peers of mine at other shops where flash and/or cfmx is scarce
or non-existent...and based on that experience I'm saying there are some
basics steps that can be taken to avoid install/config hiccups and make the
initial experience a more positive one.
As for RTM...Most questions can certainly be answered by scouring
the abundance of material...It's not the lack of information or
documentation...it's the accessibility of that info that's key. Heck most
questions posted on the list are documented somewhere...but folks are busy
so we help each other out by combining our knowledge and
experience...providing us with immediate links to what we need to move
forward.
My point was that certain aspects of the Mx product line can appear
murky to newcomers when setting up and evaluating....and we're not talking
newbie IT folks...we're talking folks with experience on other platforms
looking at the MX solution for the first time in most cases. Not stating
facts, just an observations! :)
Cheers I'm goin' for a brewski
Stace
-----Original Message-----
From: Lee Fuller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 7:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: MM Folks...
Stace,
I don't think that the meaning of his question was how you interpreted
it. I think Jochem was (or at least this is the way *I* read it) simply
trying to see if the documentation would have skirted some of the issues
you found with this install. Or if RTM would not have helped enough to
be useful.
Correct me if I'm wrong. But I don't think that he meant "RTFM and all
things would be clear." My impression was that he was just trying to
clarify.
Just my .02...
(And, I think that not all issues would be solved by reading the
manual... btw.)
Lee
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 4:02 PM
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: RE: MM Folks...
|
|
| Yes I would say most *are* documented...but that wasn't my
| point! Anyway Jochem thx for the input...
|
| Stace
|
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 6:40 PM
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: Re: MM Folks...
|
| Stacy Young wrote:
| > You know what, you're right. I'm sure if they read
| every single piece
| > of literature on the subject once or twice then there wouldn't be
| any
| > trouble at all.
|
| That sort of surprises me, considering the "or even knowing
| about it in
| the first place" you used. So you think all issues are documented?
|
| Jochem
|
|
|
______________________________________________________________________
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
