On Wednesday, August 21, 2002, at 09:05 , Benoit Hediard wrote: > - "J2EE design patterns do not apply to CFMX." > Why? Can't you apply MVC to CFMX?
As Matt says: MVC != J2EE Design Pattern. > Good design patterns are usually not link to technologies. Exactly. > "... I would not hesitate to say that ColdFusion MX is now the fastest way > to build and deploy J2EE applications..." Jeremy Allaire With all due respect to my (former) manager, that's a bit of marketing speak and should be viewed in context! :) If you've got a bunch of JSP tag libraries and JavaBeans and EJBs but need to turn it into a web application, CFMX is better than JSP. If you've got a J2EE app server and want to build and deploy a new application, CFMX may well be the best way to go about it. If needed, you can always refactor the pure CF system into a suitable mix of CF and Java later. You can reuse JSP tag libraries and other Java components directly in CF. You gain because of CF's RAD power. Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
