What makes this so compelling (and so frustrating) is that we all are on the same side!
Dick On Wednesday, September 18, 2002, at 08:34 PM, Joe Eugene wrote: > Yea!!! thanks a lot Ben . > > We are looking forward to any improvements...and will defnitely brag > on it.. > when its out... > >> Oh, I agree. CF should keep getting better (and I believe it has been >> doing just that). >> So, yep, suggestions on how to improve CF are useful, and we'll keep >> doing just that. Just don't expect CF to do it all, it can't and >> frankly >> it shouldn't. > > Dick, thanks again on your support... > > Joe > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 11:17 PM >> To: CF-Talk >> Subject: RE: Jsp Vs Cfm (CFMX) -- Test Code >> >> >> Dick, >> > >> >> My only point is that they'll always be a better way to do something, >> whether it is a small piece of code or a complex process, and whenever >> that is the case the solution is to use the right add-on or extension >> technology. >> >> Fact of the matter is that CF has supported extensions ever since the >> CFX API was added way back in CF2. Then came COM, CORBA, Java, etc. >> All >> along there has been an understanding - CF cannot be the best at >> everything, nor can any other language or technology or platform. >> > >> >> --- Ben >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dick Applebaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 11:14 PM >> To: CF-Talk >> Subject: Re: Jsp Vs Cfm (CFMX) -- Test Code >> >> >> Aw, 'cmon Ben, one of the great advantages of CF is it can address a >> broad range of applications -- all Joe wants do to is extend the range >> & help MM sell into a broader range of solutions. >> >> Will MM get them all? --Never!. Can MM get more? All of us >> certainly hope so! >> >> What if optimizing the code made CF a viable option to 20% more of the >> market than they already have -- anyone of could sell the advantages >> of >> CF over JSP into that marketplace! >> >> Geeze, I did it again! >> >> Dick >> >> >> On Wednesday, September 18, 2002, at 07:47 PM, Ben Forta wrote: >> >>> Some parts of your app should not be written in CF, no one has ever >>> said >>> otherwise. Similarly parts of your app should not be written in Java. >>> >> >> >> > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
