Personally, I would much prefer that the tag would be fixed to work as described in the documentation. Until cfstoredproc can receive variables by name in any order, then I will be forced to stick with cfquery.
Andy -----Original Message----- From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:sean@;corfield.org] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:49 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: cfprocparam / dbvarname issue? On Tuesday, Oct 22, 2002, at 11:06 US/Pacific, S. Isaac Dealey wrote: > another it was never achieved -- but the docs have always reflected the > desired functionality rather than the actual functionality. So we're agreed that it's a documentation bug then? ;) An Architect's View -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ Macromedia DevCon 2002, October 27-30, Orlando, Florida Architecting a New Internet Experience Register today at http://www.macromedia.com/go/devcon2002 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
