Wouldn't that be XML? -Kevin
.. > So thanks for improving the product, we did choose yours for a reason. I'd > just like to see a solid format for storing content long-term and still > being able to change its presentation 10 years down the road if > needed. ... > > Adam. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Pete Freitag [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 3:21 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: MM Rich Text Editor - WAS: RE: Macromedia Contribute > > > > > > Adam, in ActivEdit 3.0 we added a bunch of regular > > expressions, and parsers > > to clean up Word content pasted into the control, it's not > > perfect but it > > does get rid of lots of extraneous markup when you paste from > > Word. Are you > > using Version 3? > > > > As for the HTML that ActivEdit generates (actually it's the > > ActiveX control > > that generates the HTML in most cases), it is valid HTML 3.2. > > Many people > > prefer XHTML output these days, and we do have a CFX tag that > > will convert > > HTML 3.2 or 4 into XHTML or vise versa, if your interested > > let me know. The > > next version of ActivEdit will address these issues further. > > > > You can also set a stylesheet for use within activedit via > > the stylesheet > > attribute. > > > > _____________________________________________ > > Pete Freitag > > CTO, CFDEV.COM > > http://www.cfdev.com/ > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Cantrell, Adam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 1:33 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: MM Rich Text Editor - WAS: RE: Macromedia Contribute > > > > > > I'd like to see an editor that only defines classes in a div > > or a span, and > > which provides a default style sheet. The extent of the html > > would be very > > simple <a>, <br />, <hr /> and XHTML compliant. One problem I > > see with this > > is pulling in word documents, or old HTML with tables and > > invalid markup. > > > > We're currently using ActiveEdit, and even though it's > > working well, I have > > this really uneasy feeling about the HTML it's producing. It > > just completely > > goes against the concept of separating content from style, > > but I just can't > > think of a suitable alternative to doing it this way until we can: > > a. Go through all of our old content stripping out all of the > > markup, and > > then restylizing it using the new editor's classes. > > b. Make the decision to never paste word documents, or old > > html into the > > editor without first "cleansing" it in notepad, and then > > restylizing it > > within the editor. > > > > That would be a complete administrative nightmare. > > > > Is anyone else feeling the same concerns, and has anyone > > taken measures to > > address this? I'd be interested in hearing what you did. > > > > Adam. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Joshua Miller > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 10:00 AM > > > To: CF-Talk > > > Subject: MM Rich Text Editor - WAS: RE: Macromedia Contribute > > > > > > > > > I would think that given those abilities that integrating it into an > > > intranet security context would provide functionality for > > permissions. > > > Personally, I'd rather have something that lets me control file/edit > > > permissions and simply sticks to editing capabilities. I want a > > > super-form-control more than a content manager - I'll handle > > > the content > > > management as it applies to my specific application. > > > > > > Is there a version of the DRK2 Rich Text Editor online > > anywhere that I > > > could try before I buy? I'd like to be able to make an > > > informed decision > > > before jumping into something. > > > > > > Although from the looks of ActivEdit it's going to be hard to beat. > > > > > > Joshua Miller > > > Head Programmer / IT Manager > > > Garrison Enterprises Inc. > > > www.garrisonenterprises.net > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > (704) 569-9044 ext. 254 > > > > > > ************************************************************** > > > ********** > > > ************* > > > Any views expressed in this message are those of the > > > individual sender, > > > except where the sender states them to be the views of > > > Garrison Enterprises Inc. > > > > > > This e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to > > > which it is > > > addressed and contains information that is private and > > > confidential. If > > > you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any > > > dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly > > prohibited. If you > > > have received this e-mail in error please delete it immediately and > > > advise us by return e-mail to > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ************************************************************** > > > ********** > > > ************* > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 10:32 AM > > > To: CF-Talk > > > Subject: RE: Macromedia Contribute > > > > > > > > > There are built-in controls to limit users to a particular > > directory; > > > disallow editing of scripts/includes/forms/ or even > > anything but text; > > > allow or disallow the ability to assign css styles, and disable the > > > <font> tag and even inline css styles. You can limit users to > > > only edit > > > pages, create pages based on templates, , create pages by > > copying any > > > existing page, or make anything from scratch. And you can > > > define a file > > > size limit to how large of a graphic can be used on a page > > (in KB, not > > > dimensions.) > > > > > > That's pretty much what you can control. You can create > > > groups of users > > > with different permissions. Other than that, it's not really > > > extensible > > > for permissions from what I can see. > > > > > > -Kevin > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Kay Smoljak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 8:30 AM > > > > To: CF-Talk > > > > Subject: Re: Macromedia Contribute > > > > > > > > > > > > Samuel R. Neff wrote: > > > > > If that's what you want you can take a look at > > > > > MM's DRK2 which has a Rich Text Editor component for Flash. It > > > > can easily > > > > > be wrapped into a stand-alone widget for embedding in HTML and > > > > an also be > > > > > extended. > > > > > > > > Does anyone have this, who would like to comment on how > > > extendable it > > > > is? For example. if I wanted to limit the html editing controls my > > > > users had (no fonts or colours, for example, or only stylesheet > > > > classes) could I do this? Or say I wanted to change the > > > colour of the > > > > component to match my app... > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Kay. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Kay Smoljak > > > > ---------------------------- > > > > http://kay.smoljak.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
