Agreed. I'm not sure if it's presence is considered a "violation" of compliance, though I would think that a user that it would cause problems for would have it disabled.
Matthew P. Smith Web Developer, Object Oriented Naval Education & Training Professional Development & Technology Center (NETPDTC) (850)452-1001 ext. 1245 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Scott Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 4:15 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Form validation & 508 compliancy >So if you are going to do server side to protect your app/data anyway, why >even invest the extra work in JS... Because as a User I prefer client-side validation to save me some trips to the server, if possible. For the 90% of users with it enabled, it can be user-friendly. Of course, you should ALWAYS do server-side . . . . And, for most forms, the client-side validation is pretty quick & easy to do [paricularly if you have a set of standard validation functions you call]. Scott -------------------------------- Scott Brady http://www.scottbrady.net/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
