In my experience with storing recordsets in cached structures, subsequent 
reading records from the structure was slower than reading the same records 
from a cached query.

Is this expected behavior, or did I screw up? (first time again)

best,  paul


At 04:29 PM 12/13/02 -0500, you wrote:
> > One thing to check is whether CFSEARCH allows caching
> > (Studio doesn't think it does, which agrees with my
> > recollection). If your app is as amenable to caching
> > queries as www.SMARTERyellowPages.com is, then your
> > choice may be clear.
>
>While you can't use CACHEDWITHIN or CACHEDAFTER attributes with CFSEARCH as
>you can with CFQUERY, you can certainly cache a recordset from CFSEARCH by
>storing it in a persistent variable.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Reply via email to