There are also books out on Fusebox "Discovering Fusebox 3" published by Techspedition (www.techspedition.com) which also has an eWorkbook that can be used with it to self-test your knowledge as you go along.
"Fusebox: Developing ColdFusion applications" published by NewRiders. There is also "Fusebox: methodology and techniques" but that is now 3 years old and quite out of date -----Original Message----- From: Mosh Teitelbaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 4:40 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question There's also cfObjects (http://www.cfobjects.com/). My IE Favorites list has gotten unmanageable again and I can't find the links to the others I've bookmarked. Sheesh. As for FuseBox info, check out their site http://www.fusebox.org. -- Mosh Teitelbaum evoch, LLC Tel: (301) 625-9191 Fax: (301) 933-3651 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.evoch.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Adrocknaphobia Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 4:17 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question > > > " Fusebox is the most widely distributed Framework/Methodology for > developing ColdFusion Applications" > > What other Framework/Methodologies exist for Cold Fusion? > > Is the fuseBox framework/methodology decided by a consortium? Or by a > few elite people? > > Adam Wayne Lehman > Web Systems Developer > Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health > Distance Education Division > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Brunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 3:09 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question > > As far as I understand it Hal Helms is no longer on the Fusebox > committee, he was a founding member. I can tell you that he is still > very much involved with Fusebox and at the forefront of the Fusebox > iteration for ColdFusion MX just repeating here, you can see some of > his work in that regard here > http://www.halhelms.com/webresources/fuseboxmxpreso/page1.htm. > > Fusebox is the most widely distributed Framework/Methodology for > developing ColdFusion Applications and as stated here is also being > looked at for ASP, > JSP and PHP development. There are rumblings that CFC's obviate the > need > for Fusebox, my feelings are that CFC's as of themselves do not answer > all > the application needs that Fusebox including Fusedocs (a documentation > capability) and FLiP (an application lifecycle methodology) answered. > > Many people are waiting to see what Fusebox for ColdFusion MX looks > like and I also know that there is a lot of interest among Flash > developers about Fusebox as a methodology/framework for Flash > Application development. > > Kind Regards - Mike Brunt, CTO > Webapper > Blog http://www.webapper.net > Web site http://www.webapper.com > Downey CA Office > 562.243.6255 > AIM - webappermb > > Web Application Specialists > > > -----Original Message----- > From: charlie griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 11:48 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Design Pattern Question > > > Scott Wilhelm writes: > > > This might be a stupid question, but what's Fusebox? (Sorry, I'm a > > newbie in the CF world) > > http://www.fusebox.org. > > it's a fairly popular design methodology (started with CF, and i > believe has been ported to PHP). > > Altho I understand that CFC's, now available in CFMX, kind of render > fusebox moot (disclaimer: i do not know fusebox...i do not know for > certain that fusebox is no longer 'worthwhile'...this is only > something that i have heard > in certain circles) :) > > charlie > > > > > > > > > SW > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Adrocknaphobia Jones > > Sent: Mon 01/13/2003 02:22 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Cc: > > Subject: RE: Design Pattern Question > > > > > > > > Not one to start gossip, but I was under the influence that Hal > > Helms > > left the fusebox group. Is this true? If so why did he leave, if > > not, > > why is this rumor floating around? > > > > Adam Wayne Lehman > > Web Systems Developer > > Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health > > Distance Education Division > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mike Brunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 12:13 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: Design Pattern Question > > > > Yes this is a good methodology to consider as we all move out of > > procedural > > methodologies to more 'OO' based concepts. Yet in my opinion there > > is a > > further dimension that Fusebox achieves, or has done for us, that I > > have > > not > > yet seen expounded in CFMX tutorials etc. > > > > Using Fusebox in conjunction with FLIP we have a complete > > application > > design > > and development environment from concept-discussion through > > coding-ongoing > > maintenance. In addition by using Fusebox we have found it easy to > > bring in > > developers who had never coded on CF before but who had a good > > grasp of > > HTML, JavaScript and/or ASP-JSP. Further by abstracting the > > actual > > Fuseaction values till run-time Fusebox truly affords the > > capability at > > another layer of separation, that of separating design from > > development; > > when combined with the very descriptive capabilities afforded by > > the use > > of > > Fusedocs. Finally, the logicality of using Circuits as a > > mapping/pathing > > mechanism addresses to physical layout questions of developing a > > web > > application. > > > > There is one last very important point here, there have been many > > previous > > methodologies/frameworks applied to ColdFusion development. > > What is > > different in Fusebox is it has become the most widely used of > > all of > > them > > and that is a very considerable factor for those of us using > > teams of > > developers that can change, grow, shrink etc. > > > > I recommend you take a look at Hal Helms work > > http://www.halhelms.com/webresources/fuseboxmxpreso/page1.htm as > > CFMX > > and > > Fusebox are melded to form the next iteration of Fusebox. > > > > Kind Regards - Mike Brunt > > Webapper Services LLC > > Web Site http://www.webapper.com > > Blog http://www.webapper.net > > > > Webapper <Web Application Specialists> > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Peter Bagnato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 6:38 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: Design Pattern Question > > > > I think that this is a very healthy design methodology for CF. > > > > Ben Forta has been harping for ages about the importance of > > separating > > the > > display, application, and data layers from the CF applications. > > > > The methodology outlined in that page presents this to the CF > > environment. > > > > It actually follows many of the well known and widely used J2EE > > methodologies out there. That was something that always bugged me > > about > > FuseBox and other methodologies presented for CF. > > > > Those are just my thoughts: > > Peter Bagnato > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Cutter (CF_Talk) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 11:59 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Design Pattern Question > > > > Has anyone here taken a detailed look at the CFMX (semi) OOP design > > pattern put forth at http://www.benorama.com? Is anyone here > > using it? > > Formed some opinions? Have anything to add (or subtract)? Know > > who put > > this together in the first place? > > > > As one of my former commanders used to ask "Questions? Comments? > > War > > Stories?" > > > > Cutter > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
