Have you double checked your own cookies to make sure that the CFID/CFTOKEN you're getting is indeed a UUID? I don't think the issue is that you're the only one getting the error. I've seen several people who get the same thing. It's just that most either 1) Don't know what it is and therefore ignore it. 2) See it show up only once/twice a day in their error logs and decide to ignore it.
You mentioned you have your purge set to one week. What happens if you set it down to 1-2 days? Does that help any? How busy is your website? If you're fairly busy, one week might be too long? Is there any data you're storing in the client variables that NEEDS to be kept longer than a day? If not, then why keep it for a week? -Novak ----- Original Message ----- From: "Webmaster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 8:22 PM Subject: CDATA dup insert error Again > Hi, > I am still getting this error. The last time I asked the list we went > around in circles about locking and purging the client var data store. > Well, the purge is working fine. I have it set to one week and there are > only a weeks worth of entries in the db. I don't understand how this can > happen. I am using the Uuid version of the cftoiken so it is supposed to > guarantee unique values (TechNote 22427) > > 162.39.133.60, Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; Hotbar > 4.1.8.0), ODBC Error Code = 23000 (Integrity constraint violation) > [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Cannot insert duplicate key > row in object 'CDATA' with unique index 'id1'.Date/Time: 01/15/03 > 19:29:28Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; Hotbar > 4.1.8.0)Remote Address: 162.39.133.60Query String: > brand=685&brandText=Easy%20Spirit&emailCampaign=GETFIT0103The id1 index is > based on two fields, cfid and app. To me, this error means that generated > a cftoken that was not unique. > I just think this is a bug and I can't believe I am the only one having this > problem. Any ideas.... > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "samcfug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:04 PM > Subject: Re: What's wrong with ASP.NET > > > > Hopefully you do not have Active Server Pages installed. I will imagine > that is > > the culprit as opposed to having the .NET framework > > > > > > > > ===================================== > > Douglas White > > group Manager > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.samcfug.org > > ===================================== > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "S. Isaac Dealey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 9:11 PM > > Subject: What's wrong with ASP.NET > > > > > > | I'm not sure how many other folks here this bothers, but I thought I > might > > | mention it. > > | > > | I don't know when or how or why this has happened, but here's the story. > > | > > | I'm usint WinNT 2000 Server, IIS 5 and have CF 5 and CFMX installed on > this > > | machine. I do a lot of development on this machine, and by and large, I > > | expect the applications I develop to behave in predictable ways. > > | > > | ASP.NET has in some viral way changed that order of things. > > | > > | I've noticed in my registry that there are now a number of references to > > | ASP.NET and aspnet_* directories. > > | > > | I've never knowingly installed anything related to ASP.NET on this > machine. > > | I'm not saying that I wouldn't have, I just haven't. They could have > gotten > > | in piggy-backed on a Windows update, sure. > > | > > | But here's the really big / stupid part of this ordeal. > > | > > | In one particular application which I use to manage my website at > > | http://www.turnkey.to ( in addition to managing the documentation for > the > > | application ), Microsoft has for some reason known only to them decided > that > > | this application should have some ASP.NET features. It added the > directory: > > | > > | c:\inetpub\wwwroot\new epoch\tapestry43e\aspnet_client > > | > > | which appears to contain only 2 subdirectories and three small > javascript > > | libraries: > > | > > | system_web\1_0_3705_288\SmartNav.js > > | system_web\1_0_3705_288\SmartNavIE5.js > > | system_web\1_0_3705_288\WebUIValidation.js > > | > > | These are not now nor have the ever been components of my application. > They > > | serve no purpose here that I know of. So why would M$ arbitrarily decide > > | that this was needed here? I deleted them once already and they grew > back, > > | so I know they're being automatically generated by someone else's crap > > | software. > > | > > | I've never really trusted Microsoft anyway, but it reminds me to never, > > | EVER, use my computers to store sensitive personal information, for any > > | reason or under ANY circumstances. Microsoft / Yahoo Wallet, yea, right, > > | that'll happen. This time it was javascript libraries -- what will it be > > | next time? How much of my work will it destroy? How much of my life will > it > > | invade? > > | > > | Thank you Micro$PAM > > | > > | s. isaac dealey 954-776-0046 > > | > > | new epoch http://www.turnkey.to > > | > > | lead architect, tapestry cms http://products.turnkey.to > > | > > | tapestry api is opensource http://www.turnkey.to/tapi > > | > > | certified advanced coldfusion 5 developer > > | http://www.macromedia.com/v1/handlers/index.cfm?ID=21816 > > | > > | > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
