So are you saying that, since Flash is so available on browsers, that nothing needs to be added to the user's browser to enable a user to request data on a site remote from the ColdFusion site where the central database resides?
Is the WDDX serializer also slow when "serializing" to javascript? best, paul At 06:50 PM 1/16/03 -0500, you wrote: >Advantage is you can send and receive objects very easily for the >developer, just include the WDDX serializer/deserializer at design time. >BIG disadvantage is that WDDX is very slow, especially in F5 and even >compared to other XML schemas. > >If you're using MX, then you should use Remoting. If you're not using >MX, you should seriously consider upgrading. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: paul smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 10:02 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: ColdFusion, WDDX, and Flash > > > > > > Any advantage to using Flash with WDDX for data syndication? > > > > For example, when a user makes a data request to a remote > > machine, which is > > passed via WDDX to the central machine where the data > > resides, would a > > Flash implementation require the user to download a > > Flash/WDDX/etc module? > > > > best, paul > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
