Thanks for your help on this.

Thanks, Mark 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 12:48 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SOT: XML version / DOC type


CSE is correct.  You have to VERY careful with your doctype when dealing
with IE6, because it _will_ follow it to the letter.  So, if you have tags
and layout that doesn't agree with the XHTML transitional doctype, it won't
render correctly in IE6.

----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Leder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:39 am
Subject: SOT: XML version /  DOC type

> I'm using DWMX with CF.
> 
> When creating a new page that I wish to be XHTML compliant, DWMX
> insertsthis into the first two lines of the page:
> 
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" 
> "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>
> 
> Problem is, when I run the page/template through a validator, such
> as CSE
> HTML v5.5, it throws the following error message:
> 
> [88] Using an XML declaration, although strongly encouraged by the
> XHTMLrecommendation, may cause problems by causing browsers, such 
> as Internet
> Explorer 6.0, to trigger "quirks" mode rendering. This mode causes
> non-standards complaint rendering. Because of this, you may want 
> to consider
> removing the XML declaration.
> 
> So who'se right?  DWMX or CSE?  Do I need the <?xml ... In my code>?
> 
> 
> Thanks, Mark
> 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
                                

Reply via email to