> If you're using CFMX, though, you might not even bother with it. Its > popularity is largely based on the fact that it's the only way to write > user-defined functions in CF 5. You can do a lot more (and do it better) > with the CFFUNCTION tag in CFMX.
Really Dave ? I would say programmers coming from php,c,java,javascript would find <cfscript preferable in some a lot of cases. I do. Especially for loops in loops etc... Pity stuff like ==, != and i++ aren't is cfscript . > > I'll look into the syntax more, but can you tell > > me if I can include all my cfscripts in a separate > > doc? I can just make it a cfinclude, why not You can even put a function into application, session etc. scope. WG ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
