Matt do you choose to use rSession globally in your session management projects or does it depend on the project's needs?
If I told myself that I'm going to use rSession is all my projects that require statefulness - would I be off base? How about building the usage of rSession in applications that currently are not clustered, but could be in the future. Would that be a good "proactive" architectural design step to consider? Thanks, Ali Daniali -----Original Message----- From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 2:50 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFMX (Session State Replication) One fairly popular method for many CFers is to use rSession, which stores session information as WDDX packets in a database. I wrote something similar that stores session information on a shared file system for improved performance and scalability over a database. Matt Liotta President & CEO Montara Software, Inc. http://www.montarasoftware.com/ 888-408-0900 x901 > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 2:10 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re:CFMX (Session State Replication) > > Matt, > Apart from CFMX Pricing.. > Is there any other way to replicate Session State across multiple servers? > Maybe Something like > 1.Copy the Session State variables to either an Object Database or any DB > via XML to Client State and Parse back to Session state? Write the parsing > in Java..avoiding the overhead of wddx. > > Any other ways? Appreciate it. > > Joe > > > -------Original Message------- > From: Matt Liotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: 02/03/03 04:11 PM > To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: MM Pricing Problem on CFMX for J2EE > > > > > What constitutes a new product? Isn't ColdFusion Enterprise a new > product as well? > > Matt Liotta > President & CEO > Montara Software, Inc. > http://www.montarasoftware.com/ > 888-408-0900 x901 > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Christian Cantrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 4:06 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: MM Pricing Problem on CFMX for J2EE > > > > On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 03:48 PM, Stacy Young wrote: > > > > > It's rare you'll hear me complain but in this instance I think it's > > > ridiculous...having to re-buy the same product for the J2EE version? > > > > It isn't considered the same product. From the Macromedia CFMX for > > J2EE Application Servers FAQ: > > > > "ColdFusion MX for J2EE is a new product, and therefore requires you > to > > purchase new licenses." > > > > Christian > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
