> > may have it "working stable" with a completely > > different database and/or driver set, which > > won't help you in the least bit. > > No One has yet confirmed a "working stable" CFMX > ODBC Connection... with any database.
Uh, that's not true. I confirmed a "working stable" CFMX ODBC connection to SQL Server 2000; it's not mine, but a friend's site (U.S. gov't, internal, relatively high-load, using trusted connections because it's required by the security specification). I posted that earlier this afternoon. > On the other hand we have had several people > report problems with CFMX ODBC...here. So what > is the logical conclusion? That it doesn't work as well as a pure JDBC connection? What a surprise. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
