You can alos do it this way

<cfobject component="com.locavista.location" name="objLocation">
<cfset objLocation.init(156537)>

<cfoutput>#objLocation.getName()#</cfoutput>
<cfoutput>#objLocation.getXXX()#</cfoutput>

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 March 2003 12:02
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFCs - get'ers Vs. return object


I'm just starting to write my first CFC in anger, as it were, and was
curious
about what others were doing.
Are people writing a number of of getX,getY,getName,get.... methods, each
returning a string/numer and then using
<cfobject component="com.locavista.location"
        name="objLocation">
<cfoutput>#objLocation.getName(156537)#</cfoutput>
OR writing a single get that returns a query or custom object, and then
using
<cfinvoke component="com.locavista.location"
        method="get"
        iLocId="156537"
        returnVariable="objLocation" >
<cfoutput>#objLocation.description#</cfoutput>

Obviously, no difference in output, but writing lots of get'ers is time
consuming, though provides better abstraction from the datastore.
Also, each getX will make a database query, so outputting a list of the
objects will be much slower using the first method than the second, as I see
it.

So I'm plumbing for doing it the 2nd way - is there any sort of consensous
on
this ?
--
Tom C
"Land of the free, home of the brave... you have to be brave to live there
and
enjoy the freedoms"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
                                

Reply via email to