a) Yes, they are. I guess the improvement will not make it go down 4500ms =(
b) Yes, your right on this, the cfmodule itself does not consume much cpu load, there 
must be something in the logic our queries. 

Thank you Stacy.


>a) Are these page times being recorded while CFMX has debug on? If so,
>response should be improved once it's off.
>b) If all your module calls were as simple as setting a variable you
>wouldn't have this speed issue...meaning, I don't believe the module
>calls are the root cause of ur problem...while they do add overhead, not
>sure it's 6 secs worth. You've got logic somewhere eating cpu cycles.
>
>-Stace
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Python Python [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 11:27 AM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: Improve FB3 website performance
>
>I will try do to some query caching but i doubt the actual 6000+ms
>execution time will drop to below 1000, witch is that i'm used. 
>
>Thanks for your reply.
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq

This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
http://www.cfhosting.com

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
                                

Reply via email to