I have a few clients that do not want to transfer their domain from NEtSol. So I have been using NO-IP for them without any problems.
Rick -----Original Message----- From: jon roig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 9:29 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: To DNS or not to DNS...that is the question. Yeah... I agree with these guys. DNS is something you want to be 100% reliable. For what it's worth, I've been very happy with Zoneedit.com as an external dns provider. Their rates are reasonable and I haven't experienced any downtime with them in several years. -- jon -----Original Message----- From: Dave Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:07 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: To DNS or not to DNS...that is the question. > > I wouldn't. its nice to segregate services...so that if you have to > restart either > of the servers that wont adversely affect the other.... > Not only is it advisable to segregate the services. In the case of DNS it is advisable to run DNS servers (yes multiple servers) dispersed across multiple remote networks (i.e. multiple internet locations) for reliability. Your client only needs win2k/IIS/CF running on their web server. Let the registrar handle the DNS zonefiles. If you want further control over your client's DNS, use a registrar which provides DNS zone management utilities (most provide this as standard nowadays). HTH, Dave ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
