Versoin 3.23.49-nt.  Any recommendations for or against moving to MySQL 4.0?


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Matt Robertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 11:37 PM
Subject: RE: CF5 to MySQL without ODBC


> It shouldn't be slower than Access in any circumstance.  It should be at
> *least* twice the speed of Access under light load, and in many cases
> even faster than that.
> 
> One thing that comes to mind is that myODBC 3.51 was optimized to work
> with mySQL4.  You are *probably* using mySQL 3.23.  I suggest using the
> older mySQL ODBC drivers (2.50) which were current for the older db.
> 
> --------------------------------------------
>  Matt Robertson       [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>  MSB Designs, Inc.  http://mysecretbase.com
> --------------------------------------------
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim McAtee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 10:25 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: CF5 to MySQL without ODBC
> 
> 
> We've begun moving a number of application databases from Access97 and
> Access2000 to MySQL 3 and we're currently using the MyODBC 3.51 driver
> to work
> with them from CF5.  While I'm guessing that MySQL will behave much
> better than
> Access under load, under light loads it's pretty easy to see that MySQL
> via
> ODBC is a bit slower than Access.  Are there other options beside ODBC
> for
> using MySQL (running on another machine) with CF5?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq

Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
                                

Reply via email to