Thanks Chris, But I consider it to be a very bad thing to have to develop around something of this nature. Having to spend time coding around something that won't exist in the production environment can only be a bad thing.
- Calvin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Kief" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 12:26 PM Subject: RE: DevNet Pro watermark > Have a look at this post on Steven Erat's blog addressing this very issue: > > http://63.76.26.194/index.cfm?data=20030819#1B527BFB-45A6-2844-768196FDF6530 > FE9 > > chris > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 2:31 AM > >To: CF-Talk > >Subject: DevNet Pro watermark > > > >Has anyone else had issues with the DevNet Pro CFMX 6.1 watermark breaking > >things like javascript output based templates, xml templates, plaintext > >generating templates (such as strings for older flash movies) and so forth? > > > >I've had to revert my CFMX DevNet Pro install back to 6 because it > >prevented > >me from being able to continue with development. :( > > > >- Calvin > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
