Because the .js include uses an external file. The key being external.


Adam Wayne Lehman
Web Systems Developer
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Distance Education Division


-----Original Message-----
From: jon hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 2:12 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: FYI


Can anyone clarify that the reason the js workaround will work is
because the lawsuit had only to do with html embedding?
If a _javascript_ does the actual embedding, this bypasses the patent?

--
jon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Tuesday, October 7, 2003, 1:58:40 PM, you wrote:
CL> Here is the link to our Active Content Developer Center to help
developers prepare for upcoming changes in Internet Explorer:

CL>  <http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/activecontent/>
http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/activecontent/

CL> And the link for our Active Content Update FAQ:

CL>  <http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/activecontent/faq.html>
http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/activecontent/faq.html

CL> The Active Content Update Forums (where it is best to discuss this
issue):

CL>  <http://webforums.macromedia.com/activecontent/>
http://webforums.macromedia.com/activecontent/

CL> Also, Microsoft has quite a bit of information, as well, and you can
go ahead and download the Pre-Release Internet Explorer Bits for testing
(don't worry -- the actual browser won't be released
CL> until early next year):

CL>  <http://msdn.microsoft.com/ieupdate/>
http://msdn.microsoft.com/ieupdate/

CL> Hope that helps!
CL> Christine

  _____  


[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to