I know they both work, but repeated code that forms no function is a
waste


The original code was more like
<cfcase value="11">
  <cfset num = two>
</cfcase>
<cfcase value="12">
  <cfset num = two>
</cfcase>
<cfcase value="13">
  <cfset num = two>
</cfcase>

-----Original Message-----
From: Patricia G. L. Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 5:47 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Date

Nope, they both work.  It's analogous to:

<cfcase value="11,12,13">
  <cfset num = two>
</cfcase>

Reduces redundant code.  Easier to read.

-Patti

> Just out of curiosity, shouldn't the script at the top be
>
> switch(two) {
>        case "11":
>        case "12":
>        case "13": { num = two; break; }
>        default: { num = Right(num,1); break; }
>   }
>
> instead of
>
> switch(two) {
>        case "11": { num = two; break; }
>        case "12": { num = two; break; }
>        case "13": { num = two; break; }
>        default: { num = Right(num,1); break; }
>   }
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 9:08 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Date
>
>
> I'm pretty sure there is a UDF for this at cflib.org. Yep,
> http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm?ID=349
>
>
>   _____
>
>
>
  _____  


[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to