oh, and why...cause integer fields, would almost have to index better
that a mixed character field. even tho' its a native sql server data
type
i cant imagine that its easier to index than a simple integer field.
tony
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 9:16 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Primary key preference quick poll
id int auto increment
tony
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Garza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 9:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Primary key preference quick poll
I prefer Identitity myself... we don't do any cross server replication,
so
we don't need UUIDs.
Cheers,
Jeff
_____
From: Sutton Yamanashi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 7:09 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Primary key preference quick poll
Why do you prefer
1. int (Identity / auto_increment)
2. char maybe with CreateUUID()
3. varchar
other?
Thanks!
-sutton
_____
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
- XML parsing question - missing elements Jeff Beer
- Primary key preference quick poll Sutton Yamanashi
- RE: Primary key preference quick poll Jeff Garza
- RE: Primary key preference quick poll Tony Weeg
- RE: Primary key preference quick poll Tony Weeg
- RE: Primary key preference quick poll Ricky Fritzsching
- Re: Primary key preference quick poll Tom Kitta
- RE: Primary key preference quick poll Tony Weeg
- Re: Primary key preference quick poll Tom Kitta
- RE: Primary key preference quick... Tony Weeg
- RE: Primary key preference quick... Michael T. Tangorre
- Re: Primary key preference quick... Paul Hastings
- RE: Primary key preference q... Michael T. Tangorre
- Re: Primary key preferen... Paul Hastings
- Anyone know how to upload a ... Ray Bujarski