to Mach-II? I'd be curious to see the differences both plus and minus.
We are going to be re-doing our site in the coming months and want to do
it using some type of framework, was going to be Mach-II but maybe I
will check out onTap and see which I like better.
Ben
-----Original Message-----
From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 12:41 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Framework Comparisons
In the past few weeks I've been working hard both for clients and
preparing to move (just after replacing my van). As a result of all
the upheaval in my life this month I've unfortunately not contributed
to the cf-talk list as much as I like. Most of the time lately I just
delete them all at the end of the day, sight unseen. Hopefully after
the move things will calm down a bit and I'll find myself with a
little more time during the day.
In spite of my recent lack of time, somehow I've managed to produce
the first of a series of articles comparing several popular frameworks
for ColdFusion development. This first article compares Fusebox 3 and
the onTap framework and also provides some information about a hybrid
application using both the Fusebox framework and the onTap API. I'm
calling this an FBOT (pronounced "eff-bot").
The new article can be found here:
http://www.turnkey.to/ontap/docs/index.cfm?netaction=articles/100
s. isaac dealey 972-490-6624
team macromedia volunteer http://www.macromedia.com/go/team
chief architect, tapestry cms http://products.turnkey.to
onTap is open source http://www.turnkey.to/ontap
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
