It's definately a cookie size issue.....we tested with a smaller packet size and all is well...now each step gets it's own cookie.
Thanks for the link to the tag Ray....I'll check it out.
I personally NEVER use the SESSION scope just so that I NEVER have to worry about an application moving to a clustered server environment and having session issues....if sessions are client side...life is good and scalable. I've heard MX has perhaps sorted out some of the older CF loss of session issues with clustered servers.....but I know my approach will always work...so for now I'm "sticking" (hehe) with it.
Cheers
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
t. 250.920.8830
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------
Macromedia Associate Partner
www.macromedia.com
---------------------------------------------------------
Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
Founder & Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Raymond Camden
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: WDDX, cookies, and Netscape
I'm not sure if Netscape has a smaller cookie size tan IE, but why not
simply store the value in the session scope?
Also, I have a multi-step process custom tag available on my home page that
you may like:
http://www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus/blog/index.cfm?mode=entry&entry=395FB53
7-009C-A8DB-7F53B930936AD58C
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
- WDDX, cookies, and Netscape Bryan Stevenson
- RE: WDDX, cookies, and Netscape Raymond Camden
- RE: SOLVED Re: WDDX, cookies, and Netscape Bryan Stevenson
- RE: SOLVED Re: WDDX, cookies, and Netscape Raymond Camden
- Re: SOLVED Re: WDDX, cookies, and Netsc... Bryan Stevenson
- RE: WDDX, cookies, and Netscape Adam Wayne Lehman