page will not be accessible to either those who use a screenreader or speech
browser or to anyone with _javascript_ turned off.
_____
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 6:27 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Help with Netscape 4.7
One thing we commonly do is render tables with _javascript_.
Create a _javascript_ function that draws (via document.write()) a table row
with all the dynamic bits of the row as parameters of the function. In your
table ensure that you use pixel spacers (maybe in a second row 1px high) and
the like to maintain the columns (as each row is a different table). Then,
when you want to draw the table just call the _javascript_ function with your
parameters.
Not only will this make it render faster as you are using a different table
for each row, but it will also significantly reduce the weight of the page.
(by virtue of changing all that table code printed many times, to lots of
low weight js function calls).
For an example (admittedly with only six rows per page) take a look at the
results list on http://www.usedvehicles.landrover.co.uk and the
f_drawStockItem() function.
HTH
Neil
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mickael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 December 2003 21:08
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Help with Netscape 4.7
>
>
> Hello All,
>
> I have a client that uses Netscape 4.7 over their corporate
> lan and they access certain reports in an application that I
> had built for them. Unfortunately upgrading them to IE is
> not an option.
>
> The problem I have is a certain report produces a table, and
> depending on their criteria it can be a very long table (even
> 1000 rows) where IE will display the info to the screen
> Netscape chokes on it. What happens it that Netscape appears
> to be not responding, but actually if you walk away and don't
> touch the PC the table will eventually appear.
>
> I know that Netscape does not display the table until it is
> finished loading it completely, so I thought I would try
> instead of displaying rows I would display one row tables
> instead, this is not working out either as I am having a hell
> of a time getting the columns to Line up.
>
> If anyone could point me in the right direction it would be
> greatly appreciated.
>
> Mike
>
>
>
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]